Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26488302›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Functional Analyses of Bitter Taste Receptors in Domestic Cats (Felis catus).

Weiwei Lei, Aurore Ravoninjohary, Xia Li, Robert F Margolskee, Danielle R Reed, Gary K Beauchamp, Peihua Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. TheGenes · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Use of a Low-calorie Flavored Gel to Facilitate Oral Self-administration of Analgesics in Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Weiwei LeiMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States of America.
Aurore RavoninjoharyMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States of America.
Xia LiCincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States of America.
Robert F MargolskeeMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States of America.
Danielle R ReedMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States of America.
Gary K BeauchampMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States of America.
Peihua JiangMonell Chemical Senses Center, 3500 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States of America.
Monell Chemical Senses Center · USCincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center · US

Funding

Molecular BiologyP30DC011735 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI MOSINGER, BEDRICH · 2011 to 2015
$2.5M
Comparative Genetics of Sweet Taste in CarnivoraR01DC010842 · NIDCD · MONELL CHEMICAL SENSES CENTER · PI JIANG, PEIHUA · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
NIDCD NIH HHS P30 DC011735NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC010842NIDCD NIH HHS R01DC010842
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cats are obligate carnivores and under most circumstances eat only animal products. Owing to the pseudogenization of one of two subunits of the sweet receptor gene, they are indifferent to sweeteners, presumably having no need to detect plant-based sugars in their diet. Following this reasoning and a recent report of a positive correlation between the proportion of dietary plants and the number of Tas2r (bitter receptor) genes in vertebrate species, we tested the hypothesis that if bitter perception exists primarily to protect animals from poisonous plant compounds, the genome of the domestic cat (Felis catus) should have lost functional bitter receptors and they should also have reduced bitter receptor function. To test functionality of cat bitter receptors, we expressed cat Tas2R receptors in cell-based assays. We found that they have at least 7 functional receptors with distinct receptive ranges, showing many similarities, along with some differences, with human bitter receptors. To provide a comparative perspective, we compared the cat repertoire of intact receptors with those of a restricted number of members of the order Carnivora, with a range of dietary habits as reported in the literature. The numbers of functional bitter receptors in the terrestrial Carnivora we examined, including omnivorous and herbivorous species, were roughly comparable to that of cats thereby providing no strong support for the hypothesis that a strict meat diet influences bitter receptor number or function. Maintenance of bitter receptor function in terrestrial obligate carnivores may be due to the presence of bitter compounds in vertebrate and invertebrate prey, to the necessary role these receptors play in non-oral perception, or to other unknown factors. We also found that the two aquatic Carnivora species examined had fewer intact bitter receptors. Further comparative studies of factors driving numbers and functions of bitter taste receptors will aid in understanding the forces shaping their repertoire.

Indexed as

DietAnimalsCarnivoryCatsEvolution, MolecularPlantsReceptors, G-Protein-CoupledTasteReceptors, G-Protein-Coupledtaste receptors, type 1

Identifiers

PMID26488302
PMCPMC4619199
OpenAlexW2156919698

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.