Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26487790›Full record

ArticleClinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association2015

Managing Diabetes in Pregnancy Using Cell Phone/Internet Technology.

Marguerite Lisa Bartholomew, Karen Soules, Kacy Church, Steve Shaha, Janet Burlingame, George Graham, Lynnae Sauvage, Ivica Zalud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical diabetes : a publication of the American Diabetes Association, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Informatics Interventions for Maternal Morbidity: Scoping Review.Interactive journal of medical research · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Marguerite Lisa BartholomewUniversity of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Honolulu, HI.
Karen SoulesFlorida Center for Urogynecology, Hollywood, FL.
Kacy ChurchOregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
Steve ShahaUniversity of Utah Center for Public Policy and Administration, Salt Lake City, UT.
Janet BurlingameUniversity of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Honolulu, HI.
George GrahamTufts University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Boston, MA.
Lynnae SauvageFirst Physician's Group, Sarasota, FL.
Ivica ZaludUniversity of Hawaii John A. Burns School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, Honolulu, HI.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Brief For pregnant women with diabetes, using cell phone/Internet technology to track and report self-monitoring of blood glucose results improves compliance and satisfaction compared to using the more traditional methods of log books, telephone calls, and voicemail messages.

Identifiers

PMID26487790
PMCPMC4608275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.