ArticleBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2015
Risk of cancer from occupational exposure to ionising radiation: retrospective cohort study of workers in France, the United Kingdom, and the United States (INWORKS).
Article in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 131 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
131 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Deep Breaths: A Systematic Review of the Potential Effects of Employment in the Nuclear Industry on Mortality from Non-Malignant Respiratory Disease.Radiation research · 2022Pooled it
- Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Rationale and Framework for the Monograph and Overview of Eligible Studies.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2020Pooled it
- Epidemiological Studies of Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation and Cancer: Summary Bias Assessment and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2020Pooled it
- Evaluation of Confounding and Selection Bias in Epidemiological Studies of Populations Exposed to Low-Dose, High-Energy Photon Radiation.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2020Pooled it
- Somatic health effects of Chernobyl: 30 years on.European journal of epidemiology · 2017Pooled it
- Comparison of the Effectiveness of Single-Component and Multicomponent Interventions for Reducing Radiation Doses in Patients Undergoing Computed Tomography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA internal medicine · 2020Trial
- Radiation exposure dose and influencing factors during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.PloS one · 2018Trial
- Review
- 50% reduction of intraoperative radiation in orthopedics: impact of using the fluoroscopy's lowest possible radiation settings.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2026Article
- Response: Commentary: Low-dose ionizing radiation and the exposure-lag response: protocol for a prospective cohort study on The Health Effects of Chongqing Occupational Radiation Workers.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Limited immune perturbations in mice exposed to sustained low-dose ionizing radiation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Protracted exposure to low-dose ionising radiation and cancer incidence among Canadian nuclear power plant workers.Occupational and environmental medicine · 2025Article
- Nonfluoroscopic 3D Image Guidance System Reduces Navigation Times Through Five 3D-Printed Iliofemoral Vascular Phantoms.Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International Society of Endovascular Specialists · 2025Article
- Proportion and related factors of depression and anxiety for patients with pulmonary nodules in China: a outpatient-based cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Global burden and trends in ovarian cancer attributable to environmental risks and occupational risks in females aged 20-49 from 1990 to 2021, with projections to 2050: a cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Incidence of metabolic syndrome among radiation workers exposed to low dose radiation: a national cohort study in Korea.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Equine Standing Multidetector Computed Tomography of the Distal Thoracic Limb and Tarsus Has a Lower Cumulative Radiation Dose than Digital Radiography.Veterinary radiology & ultrasound : the official journal of the American College of Veterinary Radiology and the International Veterinary Radiology Association · 2025Article
- Long-Term Trends and Projections of Multiple Myeloma Across Three Continents: A Comparative Study of China, the United States of America, the Russian Federation, England and France (1990-2036).Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Site-specific cancer mortality after low-level exposure to ionizing radiation: findings from an update of the International Nuclear Workers Study (INWORKS).American journal of epidemiology · 2025Article
- Robotics in Interventional Cardiology: Where Are We? And How Can We Expand?Korean circulation journal · 2025Article
71 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
study questionIs protracted exposure to low doses of ionising radiation associated with an increased risk of solid cancer?
methodsIn this cohort study, 308,297 workers in the nuclear industry from France, the United Kingdom, and the United States with detailed monitoring data for external exposure to ionising radiation were linked to death registries. Excess relative rate per Gy of radiation dose for mortality from cancer was estimated. Follow-up encompassed 8.2 million person years. Of 66,632 known deaths by the end of follow-up, 17,957 were due to solid cancers. STUDY ANSWER AND LIMITATIONS: Results suggest a linear increase in the rate of cancer with increasing radiation exposure. The average cumulative colon dose estimated among exposed workers was 20.9 mGy (median 4.1 mGy). The estimated rate of mortality from all cancers excluding leukaemia increased with cumulative dose by 48% per Gy (90% confidence interval 20% to 79%), lagged by 10 years. Similar associations were seen for mortality from all solid cancers (47% (18% to 79%)), and within each country. The estimated association over the dose range of 0-100 mGy was similar in magnitude to that obtained over the entire dose range but less precise. Smoking and occupational asbestos exposure are potential confounders; however, exclusion of deaths from lung cancer and pleural cancer did not affect the estimated association. Despite substantial efforts to characterise the performance of the radiation dosimeters used, the possibility of measurement error remains. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS: The study provides a direct estimate of the association between protracted low dose exposure to ionising radiation and solid cancer mortality. Although high dose rate exposures are thought to be more dangerous than low dose rate exposures, the risk per unit of radiation dose for cancer among radiation workers was similar to estimates derived from studies of Japanese atomic bomb survivors. Quantifying the cancer risks associated with protracted radiation exposures can help strengthen the foundation for radiation protection standards. FUNDING, COMPETING INTERESTS, DATA SHARING: Support from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan; Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire; AREVA; Electricité de France; US National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; US Department of Energy; and Public Health England. Data are maintained and kept at the International Agency for Research on Cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.