ArticleBMC family practice2015
The 'vicious cycle' of personalised asthma action plan implementation in primary care: a qualitative study of patients and health professionals' views.
Article in BMC family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Self-management interventions to reduce healthcare use and improve quality of life among patients with asthma: systematic review and network meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2020Pooled it
- IMPNPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2018Pooled it
- Written action plans for children with long-term conditions: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative data.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018Pooled it
- Asthma education for school staff.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Barriers and Enablers of Delivering Asthma Self-Management to Those With Intellectual Disabilities: A Scoping Review.Journal of applied research in intellectual disabilities : JARID · 2025Article
- Role of Community Pharmacist in Asthma Management: Knowledge, Attitudes and Practice.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2024Article
- Assessing Barriers and Facilitators for Implementing Clinical Practice Guidelines in Middle Eastern and North African Region: Delphi Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Acute seizure therapies in people with epilepsy: Fact or fiction? A U.S. Perspective.Epilepsy & behavior reports · 2023Review
- Caregivers' and healthcare professionals' perspective of barriers and facilitators to health service access for asthmatic children: a qualitative study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2021Article
- Evidence-Based Review of Smartphone Versus Paper Asthma Action Plans on Asthma Control.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2019Review
- Patient and provider perspectives on uptake of a shared decision making intervention for asthma in primary care practices.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2019Article
- Improving Asthma Action Plan Completion Rates across Five Divisions in an Academic Children's Hospital.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
- Assessing the knowledge to practice gap: The asthma practices of community pharmacists.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPCArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPersonal asthma action plans (PAAPs) have been guideline recommended for years, but consistently under-issued by health professionals and under-utilised by patients. Previous studies have investigated sub-optimal PAAP implementation but more insight is needed into barriers to their use from the perspective of professionals, patients and primary care teams.
methodsA maximum variation sample of professional and patient participants were recruited from five demographically diverse general practices and another group of primary care professionals in one Scottish region. Interviews were digitally recorded and data thematically analysed using NVivo.
resultsTwenty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted (11 adults with asthma, seven general practitioners, ten practice nurses, one hospital respiratory nurse). Three over-arching themes emerged: 1) patients generally do not value PAAPs, 2) professionals do not fully value PAAPs and, 3) multiple barriers reduce the value of PAAPs in primary care. Six patients had a PAAP but these were outdated, not reflecting their needs and not used. Patients reported not wanting or needing PAAPs, yet identified circumstances when these could be useful. Fifteen professionals had selectively issued PAAPs with eight having reviewed one. Many professionals did not value PAAPs as they did not see patients using these and lacked awareness of times when patients could have benefited from one. Multi-level compounding barriers emerged. Individual barriers included poor patient awareness and professionals not reinforcing PAAP use. Organisational barriers included professionals having difficulty accessing PAAP templates and fragmented processes including patients not being asked to bring PAAPs to their asthma appointments.
conclusionsPrimary care PAAP implementation is in a vicious cycle. Professionals infrequently review/update PAAPs with patients; patients with out-dated PAAPs do not value or use these; professionals observing patients' lack of interest in PAAPs do not discuss these. Patients observing this do not refer to their plans and perceive them to be of little value in asthma self-management. Twenty-five years after PAAPs were first recommended, primary care practices are still not ready to support their implementation. Breaking this vicious cycle to create a healthcare context more conducive to PAAP implementation requires a whole systems approach with multi-faceted interventions addressing patient, professional and organisational barriers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.