Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26487557›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2015

The 'vicious cycle' of personalised asthma action plan implementation in primary care: a qualitative study of patients and health professionals' views.

Nicola Ring, Hazel Booth, Caroline Wilson, Gaylor Hoskins, Hilary Pinnock, Aziz Sheikh, Ruth Jepson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. IMPNPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Written action plans for children with long-term conditions: A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative data.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Asthma education for school staff.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Evidence-Based Review of Smartphone Versus Paper Asthma Action Plans on Asthma Control.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2019
    Review
  11. Patient and provider perspectives on uptake of a shared decision making intervention for asthma in primary care practices.The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Assessing the knowledge to practice gap: The asthma practices of community pharmacists.Canadian pharmacists journal : CPJ = Revue des pharmaciens du Canada : RPC
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicola RingSchool of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK. nicola.ring@stir.ac.uk.
Hazel BoothSchool of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK. hazel.booth@students.ac.uk.
Caroline WilsonSchool of Health Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK. caroline.wilson@stir.ac.uk.
Gaylor HoskinsNursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Profession Research Unit, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK. gaylor.hoskins@stir.ac.uk.
Hilary PinnockAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. Hilary.Pinnock@ed.ac.uk.
Aziz SheikhAsthma UK Centre for Applied Research, Usher Institute of Population Health Sciences and Informatics, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. Aziz.Shiekh@ed.ac.uk.
Ruth JepsonScottish Collaboration for Public Health Research and Policy, West Richmond Street, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK. Ruth.Jepson@ed.ac.uk.

Funding

Chief Scientist Office NMAHP1Medical Research Council MR/K023209/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonal asthma action plans (PAAPs) have been guideline recommended for years, but consistently under-issued by health professionals and under-utilised by patients. Previous studies have investigated sub-optimal PAAP implementation but more insight is needed into barriers to their use from the perspective of professionals, patients and primary care teams.

methodsA maximum variation sample of professional and patient participants were recruited from five demographically diverse general practices and another group of primary care professionals in one Scottish region. Interviews were digitally recorded and data thematically analysed using NVivo.

resultsTwenty-nine semi-structured interviews were conducted (11 adults with asthma, seven general practitioners, ten practice nurses, one hospital respiratory nurse). Three over-arching themes emerged: 1) patients generally do not value PAAPs, 2) professionals do not fully value PAAPs and, 3) multiple barriers reduce the value of PAAPs in primary care. Six patients had a PAAP but these were outdated, not reflecting their needs and not used. Patients reported not wanting or needing PAAPs, yet identified circumstances when these could be useful. Fifteen professionals had selectively issued PAAPs with eight having reviewed one. Many professionals did not value PAAPs as they did not see patients using these and lacked awareness of times when patients could have benefited from one. Multi-level compounding barriers emerged. Individual barriers included poor patient awareness and professionals not reinforcing PAAP use. Organisational barriers included professionals having difficulty accessing PAAP templates and fragmented processes including patients not being asked to bring PAAPs to their asthma appointments.

conclusionsPrimary care PAAP implementation is in a vicious cycle. Professionals infrequently review/update PAAPs with patients; patients with out-dated PAAPs do not value or use these; professionals observing patients' lack of interest in PAAPs do not discuss these. Patients observing this do not refer to their plans and perceive them to be of little value in asthma self-management. Twenty-five years after PAAPs were first recommended, primary care practices are still not ready to support their implementation. Breaking this vicious cycle to create a healthcare context more conducive to PAAP implementation requires a whole systems approach with multi-faceted interventions addressing patient, professional and organisational barriers.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAsthmaAttitude of Health PersonnelAttitude to HealthFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedPatient CompliancePrecision MedicinePrimary Health CareProgram DevelopmentQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID26487557
PMCPMC4618358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.