Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26487281›Full record

ReviewBMC pregnancy and childbirth2015

Screening for iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy: a structured review and gap analysis against UK national screening criteria.

Ruramayi Rukuni, Marian Knight, Michael F Murphy, David Roberts, Simon J Stanworth

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Maternofetal Outcome in Pregnant Women with Severe Anemia.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ruramayi RukuniNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Old Road, Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK. ruramayi.rukuni@npeu.ox.ac.uk.
Marian KnightNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Old Road, Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK. marian.knight@npeu.ox.ac.uk.
Michael F MurphyDepartment of Haematology, John Radcliffe Hospital, NHS Blood & Transplant/Oxford University Hospital Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. mike.murphy@nhsbt.nhs.uk.
David RobertsDepartment of Haematology, John Radcliffe Hospital, NHS Blood & Transplant/Oxford University Hospital Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. david.roberts@ndcls.ox.ac.uk.
Simon J StanworthDepartment of Haematology, John Radcliffe Hospital, NHS Blood & Transplant/Oxford University Hospital Trust, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. simon.stanworth@nhsbt.nhs.uk.

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-011-032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIron deficiency anaemia is a common problem in pregnancy despite national recommendations and guidelines for treatment. The aim of this study was to appraise the evidence against the UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) criteria as to whether a national screening programme could reduce the prevalence of iron deficiency anaemia and/or iron deficiency in pregnancy and improve maternal and fetal outcomes.

methodsSearch strategies were developed for the Cochrane library, Medline and Embase to identify evidence relevant to UK National Screening Committee (UKNSC) appraisal criteria which cover the natural history of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia, the tests for screening, clinical management and evidence of cost effectiveness.

resultsMany studies evaluated haematological outcomes of anaemia, but few analysed clinical consequences. Haemoglobin and ferritin appeared the most suitable screening tests, although future options may follow recent advances in understanding iron homeostasis. The clinical consequences of iron deficiency without anaemia are unknown. Oral and intravenous iron are effective in improving haemoglobin and iron parameters. There have been no trials or economic evaluations of a national screening programme for iron deficiency anaemia in pregnancy.

conclusionsIron deficiency in pregnancy remains an important problem although effective tests and treatment exist. A national screening programme could be of value for early detection and intervention. However, high quality studies are required to confirm whether this would reduce maternal and infant morbidity and be cost effective.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisIron DeficienciesPrenatal DiagnosisAnemia, Iron-DeficiencyFemaleHumansIronPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeUnited KingdomIron

Identifiers

PMID26487281
PMCPMC4618150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.