Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26487233›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016

Decision-making in the management of colonoscopic perforation: a multicentre retrospective study.

Sung Bak An, Dong Woo Shin, Jeong Yeon Kim, Sung Gil Park, Bong Hwa Lee, Jong Wan Kim

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Laparoscopic repair using an endoscopic linear stapler for management of iatrogenic colonic perforation during screening colonoscopy.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Abdominal Sepsis: An Update.Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2018
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Colonoscopic Perforations.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sung Bak AnDepartment of Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 40 Sukwoo-Dong, Hwaseong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 445-170, Republic of Korea.
Dong Woo ShinDepartment of Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 40 Sukwoo-Dong, Hwaseong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 445-170, Republic of Korea.
Jeong Yeon KimDepartment of Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 40 Sukwoo-Dong, Hwaseong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 445-170, Republic of Korea.
Sung Gil ParkDepartment of Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 40 Sukwoo-Dong, Hwaseong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 445-170, Republic of Korea.
Bong Hwa LeeDepartment of Surgery, Hallym Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 896 Pyengchon-Dong Dongan-gu, Anyang-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 431-070, Republic of Korea.
Jong Wan KimDepartment of Surgery, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, 40 Sukwoo-Dong, Hwaseong-Si, Gyeonggi-Do, 445-170, Republic of Korea. kjw0153@hanmail.net.
Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital · KRHallym University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe incidence of colonoscopic perforation has increased following the widespread use of colonoscopy for the diagnosis and treatment of colorectal disease. The purpose of our study was to compare the clinical outcomes between surgical and non-surgical treatment of colonoscopic perforation.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with colonoscopic perforation, which was treated between January 2005 and December 2014. Patients were divided into two groups depending on whether they received non-surgical (conservative management or endoscopic clipping) or surgical (primary closure, bowel resection and anastomosis, and/or faecal diversion) initial treatment for the perforation. Conversion was defined as the change from a non-surgical to surgical procedure after treatment failure.

resultsOne hundred and nine patients were analysed. Surgical treatment was more common following diagnostic than therapeutic colonoscopic procedures (74.5 vs. 53.7 %, P = 0.023). Of 55 patients in the non-surgical group, 11 patients required conversion to surgery. The surgical group comprised 54 patients. The complication rate (P = 0.001), and the length of hospital stay (P < 0.001) were significantly greater in the patients requiring conversion than in the surgical group. Multivariate analysis showed that old age, American Society for Anesthesiologists score ≥ 3, and conversion were independent predictors of poor outcomes (P = 0.048, 0.032, and 0.001, respectively). Only perforation size was associated with conversion in multivariate analysis (P = 0.022).

conclusionIt is important to select an appropriate treatment in patients with colonoscopic perforation. To avoid non-surgical treatment failure, surgery should be considered in patients with a large perforation. By decreasing the rate of conversion, we might reduce the complication and mortality rates associated with colonoscopic perforation.

Indexed as

Colon, SigmoidDecision MakingAdultAgedAged, 80 and overColonic DiseasesColonoscopyFemaleHumansIatrogenic DiseaseIncidenceIntestinal PerforationLength of StayMaleMedical RecordsMiddle AgedColonoscopyConversionPerforationSurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID26487233
OpenAlexW2411311783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.