Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26487232›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2016

Cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones reduced late biliary complications: a propensity score-based cohort analysis.

Yousuke Nakai, Hiroyuki Isayama, Takeshi Tsujino, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Hirofumi Kogure, Naminatsu Takahara, Dai Mohri, Saburo Matsubara, Natsuyo Yamamoto, Minoru Tada and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prophylactic cholecystectomy offers best outcomes following ERCP clearance of common bile duct stones: a meta-analysis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yousuke NakaiDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Hiroyuki IsayamaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan. isayama-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Takeshi TsujinoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Tsuyoshi HamadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Hirofumi KogureDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Naminatsu TakaharaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Dai MohriDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Saburo MatsubaraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Natsuyo YamamotoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Minoru TadaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
Kazuhiko KoikeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
The University of Tokyo · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCholecystectomy after endoscopic sphincterotomy for bile duct stones with concomitant gallstones is known to reduce late biliary complications. Endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones develops fewer late biliary complications than endoscopic sphincterotomy, but no randomized controlled trials have been conducted about the role of cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation. Therefore, we conducted this propensity score-matched analysis to compare cholecystectomy and wait-and-see approach after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation.

methodsPropensity score matching extracted 147 pairs of patients with cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and with gallbladder left in situ with stones (wait-and-see) from 725 patients who underwent endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones. Late biliary complications such as recurrent bile duct stones and cholecystitis were evaluated. Cumulative incidence of late biliary complications was calculated treating death without biliary complications as a competing risk, and its prognostic factor was evaluated.

resultsThe rates of late biliary complications were 5.4 and 25.2 % in the cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and wait-and-see groups: Recurrent bile duct stones rates were 4.1 and 19.0 %, and cholecystitis rates were 0.7 and 6.1 %. The cumulative incidences of biliary complications in the cholecystectomy after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation and wait-and-see approach were 3.1 versus 13.0 % at 1 year and 5.7 versus 28.0 % at 5 year after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation (p = 0.008). Subdistribution hazard ratio of late biliary complications in the wait-and-see group was 5.1 (p = 0.020).

conclusionCholecystectomy after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for choledocholithiasis was associated with fewer late biliary complications. Prophylactic cholecystectomy should be offered to all surgically fit patients after endoscopic papillary balloon dilation for bile duct stones with concomitant gallstones.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCatheterizationChildCholecystectomyCohort StudiesDilatationFemaleGallstonesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreCholecystectomyCholedocholithiasisEndoscopic papillary balloon dilationEndoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography

Identifiers

PMID26487232
OpenAlexW2263254365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.