Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26487199›Full record

SynthesisSurgical endoscopy2016

Endoscopic hemostasis for peptic ulcer bleeding: systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

Felipe Baracat, Eduardo Moura, Wanderley Bernardo, Leonardo Zorron Pu, Ernesto Mendonça, Diogo Moura, Renato Baracat, Edson Ide

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Surgical endoscopy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality indicators for upper GI endoscopy.Gastrointestinal endoscopy · 2025
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Quality Indicators for Upper GI Endoscopy.The American journal of gastroenterology · 2025
    Article
  10. Non-variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Its Endoscopic Management.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Felipe BaracatGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 155, 6° andar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-900, Brazil. fibaracat@hotmail.com.
Eduardo MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 155, 6° andar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-900, Brazil.
Wanderley BernardoThoracic Surgery Department, Instituto do Coraçao (InCor), University of Sao Paulo Medical School, São Paulo, Brazil.
Leonardo Zorron PuGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 155, 6° andar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-900, Brazil.
Ernesto MendonçaGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 155, 6° andar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-900, Brazil.
Diogo MouraGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 155, 6° andar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-900, Brazil.
Renato BaracatGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 155, 6° andar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-900, Brazil.
Edson IdeGastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, University of Sao Paulo Medical School, Avenida Dr. Enéas de Carvalho Aguiar, 155, 6° andar, São Paulo, SP, CEP 05403-900, Brazil.
Universidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeptic ulcer represents the most common cause of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopic therapy can reduce the risks of rebleeding, continued bleeding, need for surgery, and mortality. The objective of this review is to compare the different modalities of endoscopic therapy.

methodsStudies were identified by searching electronic databases MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, LILACS, DARE, and CINAHL. We selected randomized clinical trials that assessed contemporary endoscopic hemostatic techniques. The outcomes evaluated were: initial hemostasis, rebleeding rate, need for surgery, and mortality. The possibility of publication bias was evaluated by funnel plots. An additional analysis was made, including only the higher-quality trials.

resultsTwenty-eight trials involving 2988 patients were evaluated. Injection therapy alone was inferior to injection therapy with hemoclip and with thermal coagulation when evaluating rebleeding and the need for emergency surgery. Hemoclip was superior to injection therapy in terms of rebleeding; there were no statistically significant differences between hemoclip alone and hemoclip with injection therapy. There was considerable heterogeneity in the comparisons between hemoclip and thermal coagulation. There were no statistically significant differences between thermal coagulation and injection therapy, though their combination was superior, in terms of rebleeding, to thermal coagulation alone.

conclusionsInjection therapy should not be used alone. Hemoclip is superior to injection therapy, and combining hemoclip with an injectate does not improve hemostatic efficacy above hemoclip alone. Thermal coagulation has similar efficacy as injection therapy; combining these appears to be superior to thermal coagulation alone. Therefore, we recommend the application of hemoclips or the combined use of injection therapy with thermal coagulation for the treatment of peptic ulcer bleeding.

Indexed as

Hemostasis, EndoscopicHemostatic TechniquesHumansPeptic UlcerPeptic Ulcer HemorrhageRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecurrenceTreatment OutcomeEndoscopic hemostasisEndoscopyGastrointestinal hemorrhageNon-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleedingPeptic ulcer

Identifiers

PMID26487199
OpenAlexW2307370153

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.