SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2015
Wound drainage after plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- To use indwelling drainage or not in dual-plane breast augmentation mammoplasty patients: A comparative study.Medicine · 2020Trial
- Augmentation Mastopexy With Polyurethane-Coated Implants in the Prepectoral Plane: A 24-Month Follow-Up Study.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Expanding Global Surgery Services to Include Reduction Mammaplasty Procedures.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Aqua Breast Augmentation (ABA): Hydrodissection Breast Augmentation Technique.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- The Role of Tranexamic Acid Use in Reduction Mammaplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Review
- Drains in Breast Reduction: How Good Is the Recommendation Not to Use Them?Aesthetic surgery journal · 2024Review
- Strategies to prevent blood loss and reduce transfusion in emergency general surgery, WSES-AAST consensus paper.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2024Review
- Management of complications following implant-based breast reconstruction: a narrative review.Annals of translational medicine · 2023Review
- Augmentation-Mastopexy: Analysis of 95 Consecutive Patients and Critical Appraisal of the Procedure.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Obesity and Complications in Mammoplasty: A Retrospective Review in an Obese Patient Population.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2022Article
- Perioperative Risk Factors for Prolonged Blood Loss and Drainage Fluid Secretion after Breast Reconstruction.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Four Ways Plastic Surgeons Can Fight Climate Change.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2020Article
- Drainage Collection After Endoscopic-Assisted Transaxillary Dual-Plane Augmentation Mammaplasty Using Cold or Electrosurgical Separation of Interpectoral Space.Plastic surgery (Oakville, Ont.) · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWound drains are often used after plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast, in order to reduce potential complications. It is unclear whether there is any evidence to support this practice and we therefore undertook a systematic review of the best evidence available.
objectivesTo compare the safety and efficacy of the use of wound drains following elective plastic and reconstructive surgery procedures of the breast. SEARCH
methodsFor the first update of this review we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 4 March 2015); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2015, Issue 2); Ovid MEDLINE (2012 to March 3 2015); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations March 3 2015); Ovid EMBASE (2012 to March 3 2015); and EBSCO CINAHL (2012 to March 4 2015). There were no restrictions on the basis of date or language of publication. SELECTION CRITERIA: Three review authors undertook independent screening of the search results. All randomised trials (RCTs) that compared the use of a wound drain with no wound drain following plastic and reconstructive surgery of the breast (breast augmentation, breast reduction and breast reconstruction) in women were eligible. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors undertook independent data extraction of study characteristics, methodological quality and outcomes (e.g. infection, other wound complications, pain, and length of hospital stay). Risk of bias was assessed independently by two review authors. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes, with 95% confidence intervals. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. MAIN
resultsThree randomised trials were identified and included in the review out of 190 studies that were initially screened; all evaluated wound drainage after breast reduction surgery. No new trials were identified for this first update. In total there were 306 women in the three trials, and 505 breasts were studied (254 drained, and 251 who were not drained). Apart from a significantly shorter duration of hospital stay for those participants who did not have drains (MD 0.77; 95% CI 0.40 to 1.14), there was no statistically significant impact of the use of drains on outcomes. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe limited evidence available shows no significant benefit of using post-operative wound drains in reduction mammoplasty, though hospital stay may be shorter when drains are not used. No data are available for breast augmentation or breast reconstruction, and this requires investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.