Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26487063›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2016

Usefulness of Prophylactic Percutaneous Gastrostomy Placement in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer Treated with Chemoradiotherapy.

Joana Moleiro, Sandra Faias, Catarina Fidalgo, Miguel Serrano, A Dias Pereira

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Malnutrition and radiation therapy in head and neck cancers, a systematic review on reported definitions and associated factors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Joana MoleiroDepartment of Gastroenterology, Instituto Português do Oncologia de Lisboa, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisbon, Portugal. joanamoleiro1984@gmail.com.
Sandra FaiasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Instituto Português do Oncologia de Lisboa, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisbon, Portugal. sandrarfaias@hotmail.com.
Catarina FidalgoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Instituto Português do Oncologia de Lisboa, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisbon, Portugal. catarinafidalgo@inbox.com.
Miguel SerranoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Instituto Português do Oncologia de Lisboa, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisbon, Portugal. mmserrano@gmail.com.
A Dias PereiraDepartment of Gastroenterology, Instituto Português do Oncologia de Lisboa, Rua Professor Lima Basto, 1099-023, Lisbon, Portugal. adiaspereira1@gmail.com.
IPO Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has evolved as the preferred organ preservation strategy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck cancer (HNC). This approach increases malnutrition, and thus, establishing a direct enteral feeding route is essential. To evaluate the usefulness of prophylactic percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) in HNC patients receiving definitive CRT, we performed a prospective evaluation of HNC patients over a 6-month period. Patients and tumor characteristics, nutritional status 30 days after PEG insertion and technique complications were evaluated. We also assessed the long-term PEG usage. Forty-seven PEGs were placed and only 2 patients did not use it. The mean time of PEG use was 131 days (4-255) and mean duration of exclusive utilization was 71 days (4-180). On 30th day after procedure, 34/45 (76 %) patients had lost weight, but only 10/45 (22 %) patients had lost more than 10 % of their initial weight. The most frequent complications were minor peristomal infections, which were correlated with proton-pump inhibitor use before PEG placement (OR 3.91, 95 % CI 1.01-15.2, and p = 0.049). One year later, 19 % of patients in remission continue needing PEG. Enteric nutritional support is essential during and after CRT in HNC patients. Most patients lost weight even with PEG. One-fifth of patients in remission required long-term PEG utilization.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionGastrostomyIntubation, GastrointestinalAdultAgedChemoradiotherapyFemaleHumansMaleMalnutritionMiddle AgedMouth NeoplasmsNutritional StatusOtorhinolaryngologic NeoplasmsProspective StudiesTime FactorsDeglutitionDeglutition disordersEnteral nutritionHead and neck cancerMalnutritionPercutaneous endoscopic gastrostomyPeristomal infection

Identifiers

PMID26487063
OpenAlexW2104402163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.