ArticleBMC medicine2015
De-adoption and its 43 related terms: harmonizing low-value care terminology.
Article in BMC medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A systematic review of experimentally tested implementation strategies across health and human service settings: evidence from 2010-2022.Implementation science : IS · 2024Pooled it
- Health technology reassessment and disinvestment instruments: a scoping review.Health research policy and systems · 2026Review
- Achieving sustainable healthcare through deprescribing.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Article
- Understanding low-value care and associated de-implementation processes: a qualitative study of Choosing Wisely Interventions across Canadian hospitals.BMC health services research · 2022Article
- Using theories and frameworks to understand how to reduce low-value healthcare: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2022Article
- De-implementation of detrimental feeding practices: a pilot protocol.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2020Article
- Barriers and facilitators to reduce low-value care: a qualitative evidence synthesis.BMJ open · 2020Article
- Better Service by Doing Less: Introducing De-implementation Research in HIV.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2020Review
- Rugged landscapes: complexity and implementation science.Implementation science : IS · 2020Article
- Understanding the public's role in reducing low-value care: a scoping review.Implementation science : IS · 2020Article
- Asymptomatic Bacteriuria: For How Long Will We Keep Swimming Against The Current?Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2020Article
- Perspectives on program mis-implementation among U.S. local public health departments.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- When Do Therapists Stop Using Evidence-Based Practices? Findings from a Mixed Method Study on System-Driven Implementation of Multiple EBPs for Children.Administration and policy in mental health · 2020Article
- Understanding how and why de-implementation works in health and care: research protocol for a realist synthesis of evidence.Systematic reviews · 2019Article
- Factors influencing current low-value follow-up care after basal cell carcinoma and suggested strategies for de-adoption: a qualitative study.The British journal of dermatology · 2019Article
- Active change interventions to de-implement low-value healthcare practices: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2019Article
- An Evidence-Based Health Care Knowledge Integration System: Assessment Protocol.JMIR research protocols · 2019Article
- A cross-country study of mis-implementation in public health practice.BMC public health · 2019Article
- Letting Go: Conceptualizing Intervention De-implementation in Public Health and Social Service Settings.American journal of community psychology · 2018Review
- Toward optimal implementation of cancer prevention and control programs in public health: a study protocol on mis-implementation.Implementation science : IS · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Research into the prevalence and impact of low-value medical practices has evolved substantially over the past two decades. However, despite international efforts, many challenges still remain with regards to progress in this field, including limits in the capacity to identify and prioritize low-value care practices and to systematically appraise clinical and policy attempts at redressing low-value care. A recent article by Niven et al. in BMC Medicine consolidates the current literature and terminology on the de-adoption of clinical practices, advocating the use of de-adoption as an appropriate term to label low-value care and proposes a new synthesis model to facilitate efforts to reverse ineffective and harmful medical practices. We hope that this work will facilitate advances in low-value care research and policy, and shift focus towards establishing evidence for de-adopting low-value interventions, which is crucial since attempts to reduce low-value care interventions have shown mixed results. Please see related article: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7015/13/255.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.