Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26486613›Full record

ReviewAIDS research and human retroviruses2015

A Shot in the Arm for HIV Prevention? Recent Successes and Critical Thresholds.

Thomas J Hope, Jeanne M Marrazzo

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AIDS research and human retroviruses, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Thomas J Hope1 Departments of Cell and Molecular Biology and Obstetrics and Gynecology in the Feinberg School of Medicine and the Department of Biomedical Engineering in the McCormick School of Engineering at Northwestern University , Chicago, Illinois.
Jeanne M Marrazzo2 Department of Medicine, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.

Funding

Sustained Long Acting Prevention Against HIV Program OperationUM1AI120184 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI HOPE, THOMAS, KISER, PATRICK FRANKLIN · 2015 to 2019
$17.9M
NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI120184NIAID NIH HHS UM1AI120184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efforts to decrease the spread of HIV worldwide continue at a rapid pace. With the development of new biomedical interventions and findings from pivotal clinical trials, a new framework for short-term and long-term prevention strategies is emerging. It is clear that biomedical-based approaches targeted at the highest risk populations have the greatest potential to have a short-term impact. Unfortunately, challenges with adherence in healthy populations at risk are now well-recognized, and competing health care priorities in the context of fragile delivery infrastructures pose formidable obstacles to implementation. We need better ways to identify high-risk populations, sophisticated understanding of the behavioral parameters that can ensure adherence, and the development of better strategies to provide sustained delivery of preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). In the long term, we need an effective vaccine--a path that has proven to be rocky. Research facilitating an increased understanding of immune responses and what represents effective responses to prevent HIV acquisition should facilitate progress. While we wait for that time, PrEP offers the best strategy for short-term impact.

Indexed as

AIDS VaccinesAnimalsAnti-HIV AgentsDisease Models, AnimalDrug DiscoveryHIV InfectionsHumansPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAIDS VaccinesAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID26486613
PMCPMC4651048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.