Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26486089›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2015

Common cancer-associated imbalances in the DNA damage response confer sensitivity to single agent ATR inhibition.

Fiona K Middleton, Miranda J Patterson, Claire J Elstob, Sarah Fordham, Ashleigh Herriott, Mark A Wade, Aiste McCormick, Richard Edmondson, Felicity E B May, James M Allan and 2 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 73 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Genotype-Directed Synthetic Cytotoxicity of ATR Inhibition with Radiotherapy.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Fiona K MiddletonNewcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Miranda J PattersonNewcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Claire J ElstobNewcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Sarah FordhamNewcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ashleigh HerriottNewcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Mark A WadeNewcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Aiste McCormickNewcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Richard EdmondsonNewcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Felicity E B MayNewcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
James M AllanNewcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
John R PollardVertex Pharmaceuticals (Europe) Limited, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK.
Nicola J CurtinNewcastle University, Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Newcastle University · GBVertex Pharmaceuticals (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ATR is an attractive target in cancer therapy because it signals replication stress and DNA lesions for repair and to S/G2 checkpoints. Cancer-specific defects in the DNA damage response (DDR) may render cancer cells vulnerable to ATR inhibition alone. We determined the cytotoxicity of the ATR inhibitor VE-821 in isogenically matched cells with DDR imbalance. Cell cycle arrest, DNA damage accumulation and repair were determined following VE-821 exposure.Defects in homologous recombination repair (HRR: ATM, BRCA2 and XRCC3) and base excision repair (BER: XRCC1) conferred sensitivity to VE-821. Surprisingly, the loss of different components of the trimeric non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) protein DNA-PK had opposing effects. Loss of the DNA-binding component, Ku80, caused hypersensitivity to VE-821, but loss of its partner catalytic subunit, DNA-PKcs, did not. Unexpectedly, VE-821 was particularly cytotoxic to human and hamster cells expressing high levels of DNA-PKcs. High DNA-PKcs was associated with replicative stress and activation of the DDR. VE-821 suppressed HRR, determined by RAD51 focus formation, to a greater extent in cells with high DNA-PKcs.Defects in HRR and BER and high DNA-PKcs expression, that are common in cancer, confer sensitivity to ATR inhibitor monotherapy and may be developed as predictive biomarkers for personalised medicine.

Indexed as

DNA DamageDNA RepairAnimalsAntineoplastic AgentsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsBrain NeoplasmsCell Line, TumorCHO CellsComputational BiologyCricetinaeCricetulusDatabases, GeneticDNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA Repair EnzymesDose-Response Relationship, DrugG2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints3-amino-6-(4-(methylsulfonyl)phenyl)-N-phenylpyrazine-2-carboxamideAntineoplastic AgentsAtaxia Telangiectasia Mutated ProteinsATR protein, humanDNA-Activated Protein KinaseDNA Repair EnzymesMYC protein, humanNuclear ProteinsPRKDC protein, humanProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycPyrazinesSulfonesATRDNA damage responseDNA-PKcsp53synthetic lethality

Identifiers

PMID26486089
PMCPMC4741701
OpenAlexW2145747268

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.