Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26485701›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2015

Sex Bias and Maternal Contribution to Gene Expression Divergence in Drosophila Blastoderm Embryos.

Mathilde Paris, Jacqueline E Villalta, Michael B Eisen, Susan E Lott

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evolved Differences inGenetics · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Re-annotation of eightLife science alliance · 2018
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mathilde ParisDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Jacqueline E VillaltaHoward Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Michael B EisenDepartment of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, United States of America.
Susan E LottDepartment of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, Davis, California, United States of America.
University of California, Berkeley · USHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Evolution of the mRNA pool in Drosophila eggs and its effect on developmentR01GM111362 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LOTT, SUSAN E · 2014 to 2018
$1.3M
Understanding how developmental systems compensate for and are affected by changeR00GM098448 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI LOTT, SUSAN E · 2012 to 2014
$713k
Understanding how developmental systems compensate for and are affected by changeK99GM098448 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI LOTT, SUSAN E · 2011 to 2011
$90k
NIGMS NIH HHS K99 GM098448NIGMS NIH HHS K99/R00 GM098448NIGMS NIH HHS R00 GM098448NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM111362NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM111362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early embryogenesis is a unique developmental stage where genetic control of development is handed off from mother to zygote. Yet the contribution of this transition to the evolution of gene expression is poorly understood. Here we study two aspects of gene expression specific to early embryogenesis in Drosophila: sex-biased gene expression prior to the onset of canonical X chromosomal dosage compensation, and the contribution of maternally supplied mRNAs. We sequenced mRNAs from individual unfertilized eggs and precisely staged and sexed blastoderm embryos, and compared levels between D. melanogaster, D. yakuba, D. pseudoobscura and D. virilis. First, we find that mRNA content is highly conserved for a given stage and that studies relying on pooled embryos likely systematically overstate the degree of gene expression divergence. Unlike studies done on larvae and adults where most species show a larger proportion of genes with male-biased expression, we find that transcripts in Drosophila embryos are largely female-biased in all species, likely due to incomplete dosage compensation prior to the activation of the canonical dosage compensation mechanism. The divergence of sex-biased gene expression across species is observed to be often due to lineage-specific decrease of expression; the most drastic example of which is the overall reduction of male expression from the neo-X chromosome in D. pseudoobscura, leading to a pervasive female-bias on this chromosome. We see no evidence for a faster evolution of expression on the X chromosome in embryos (no "faster-X" effect), unlike in adults, and contrary to a previous study on pooled non-sexed embryos. Finally, we find that most genes are conserved in regard to their maternal or zygotic origin of transcription, and present evidence that differences in maternal contribution to the blastoderm transcript pool may be due to species-specific divergence of transcript degradation rates.

Indexed as

Dosage Compensation, GeneticEvolution, MolecularAnimalsBlastodermDrosophila melanogasterEmbryonic DevelopmentEmbryo, NonmammalianFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalMaleRNA, MessengerSex RatioSpecies SpecificityX ChromosomeRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID26485701
PMCPMC4618353
OpenAlexW1808821166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.