ArticlePLoS computational biology2015
Ten Simple Rules for Experiments' Provenance.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ten simple rules to complete successfully a computational MSc thesis project.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- Ten simple rules for establishing an experimental lab.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Ten simple rules for managing laboratory information.PLoS computational biology · 2023Article
- A Practical Guide to Reproducible Modeling for Biochemical Networks.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2023Article
- Ten simple rules for large-scale data processing.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Best Practices for Making Reproducible Biochemical Models.Cell systems · 2020Review
- A quick guide for using Microsoft OneNote as an electronic laboratory notebook.PLoS computational biology · 2019Article
- The Spectrum of Mechanism-Oriented Models and Methods for Explanations of Biological Phenomena.Processes (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
- Using digital health to enable ethical health research in conflict and other humanitarian settings.Conflict and health · 2018Review
- Long-term preservation of biomedical research data.F1000Research · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.