Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26485382›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral & facial pain and headache2015

Amplified Brain Processing of Dentoalveolar Pressure Stimulus in Persistent Dentoalveolar Pain Disorder Patients.

Estephan J Moana-Filho, David A Bereiter, Donald R Nixdorf

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral & facial pain and headache, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Estephan J Moana-Filho
David A Bereiter
Donald R Nixdorf

Funding

ZOOMED FUNCT IMAGING IN HUMAN BRAIN AT 7T W/ SIMULT HIGH SPATIAL &TEMPORAL RESP41RR008079 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI VAN DE MOORTELE, PIERRE-FRANCOIS · 1993 to 2011
$16.3M
Scholar Development Clinical Research (RMI)K12RR023247 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI LUEPKER, RUSSELL V · 2005 to 2009
$13.5M
Neuroscience Cores For MR Studies of the BrainP30NS057091 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL · 2006 to 2011
$8.5M
NMR Imaging and SpectroscopyP41EB015894 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL · 2012 to 2017
$8.4M
NCRR NIH HHS K12 RR023247NCRR NIH HHS K12-RR023247NCRR NIH HHS P41 RR008079NCRR NIH HHS P41-RR008079NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB015894NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS057091NINDS NIH HHS P30-NS057091
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aims(1) To determine the brain regions activated by dentoalveolar pressure stimulation in persistent dentoalveolar pain disorder (PDAP) patients, and (2) to compare these activation patterns to those seen in pain-free control subjects.

methodsA total of 13 PDAP patients and 13 matched controls completed the study. Clinical pain characteristics and psychosocial data were collected. Dentoalveolar mechanical pain thresholds were determined with a custom-made device over the painful area for patients and were used as the stimulation level during functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data acquisition. Control subjects received two stimulation levels over matched locations during fMRI scanning: one determined (as above) that evoked equally subjective pain ratings matching those of patients (subjective-pain match) and another nonpainful stimulation level matching the average stimulus intensity provided to patients (stimulus-intensity match). Clinical and psychosocial data were analyzed using independent samples t tests, Mann-Whitney U test, and Spearman rank-order correlation coefficient. fMRI data were analyzed using validated neuroimaging software and tested using a general linear model.

resultsPDAP patients had greater anxiety (P<.0001) and depression scores (P=.001), more jaw function impairment (P<.0001), and greater social impact (P<.0001) than controls. No significant differences were found for brain activation spatial extent (PDAP X Controls subjective pain: P=.48; PDAP X Controls stimulus intensity: P=.12). Brain activations were significantly increased for PDAP patients compared to control subjects when matched to stimulus intensity in several regions related to the sensory-discriminative and cognitive components of pain perception, including the primary and secondary somatosensory cortices, inferior parietal lobule, insula, premotor cortex, prefrontal cortex, and thalamus. When matched to subjective pain ratings, increased brain activations were still present for PDAP patients compared to controls, although to a lesser extent.

conclusionThe present results suggest that dentoalveolar pressure is processed differently in the brain of PDAP patients, and the increased activation in several brain areas is consistent with amplified pain processing.

Indexed as

AdultAlveolar ProcessAnxietyBrainCase-Control StudiesCerebral CortexCognitionDepressionFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexNeural PathwaysPain Perception

Identifiers

PMID26485382
PMCPMC4772893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.