ArticlePloS one2015
The More the Better? A Comparison of the Information Sources Used by the Public during Two Infectious Disease Outbreaks.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Sources of information on monkeypox virus infection. A systematic review with meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2024Pooled it
- Determinants of Infodemics During Disease Outbreaks: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in public health · 2021Pooled it
- Promoting HPV vaccination among adolescent girls in low-resource areas of China: A multi-centered qualitative study.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Exploring the Information Sources Consulted by Doctors at the Point of Care in Four Selected South African Referral Hospitals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- COVID-19 Information Seeking Behaviors of University of Hawai'i at Mānoa Undergraduates: Information Channels, Sources, and Consumption.Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare · 2023Article
- Sources of information in times of health crisis: evidence from Turkey during COVID-19.Zeitschrift fur Gesundheitswissenschaften = Journal of public health · 2022Article
- Survey on public awareness, attitudes and self-protective behavior adoption in different periods of COVID-19.Frontiers in public health · 2022Article
- Health authorities' health risk communication with the public during pandemics: a rapid scoping review.BMC public health · 2021Article
- Sources of COVID-19-Related Information in People with Various Levels of Risk Perception and Preventive Behaviors in Taiwan: A Latent Profile Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Insights from the comparisons of SARS-CoV and COVID-19 outbreaks: The evidence-based experience of epidemic prevention in China.Medicine · 2021Review
- Parental trust and beliefs after the discovery of a six-year-long failure to vaccinate.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021Article
- Caregivers' Sources of Information About Immunization as Predictors of Delayed Childhood Vaccinations in Saudi Arabia During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2021Article
- Public health education for parents during the outbreak of COVID-19: a rapid review.Annals of translational medicine · 2020Article
- Adequacy of public health communications on H7N9 and MERS in Singapore: insights from a community based cross-sectional study.BMC public health · 2018Article
- Immunization and media coverage in Italy: an eleven-year analysis (2007-17).Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2018Article
- Vaccine Hesitancy: In Search of the Risk Communication Comfort Zone.PLoS currents · 2017Article
- Capsule Commentary on Ganguli et al., Ebola Risk and Preparedness: A National Survey of Internists.Journal of general internal medicine · 2016Article
- Use of Obstetric Practice Web Sites to Distribute Zika Virus Information to Pregnant Women During a Zika Virus Outbreak.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMPArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recent infectious disease outbreaks have resulted in renewed recognition of the importance of risk communication planning and execution to public health control strategies. Key to these efforts is public access to information that is understandable, reliable and meets their needs for informed decision-making on protective health behaviours. Learning from the trends in sources used in previous outbreaks will enable improvements in information access in future outbreaks. Two separate random-digit dialled telephone surveys were conducted in Alberta, Canada, to explore information sources used by the public, together with their perceived usefulness and credibility, during the 2003 Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) epidemic (n = 1209) and 2009-2010 H1N1 pandemic (n = 1206). Traditional mass media were the most used information sources in both surveys. Although use of the Internet increased from 25% during SARS to 56% during H1N1, overall use of social media was not as high as anticipated. Friends and relatives were commonly used as an information source, but were not deemed very useful or credible. Conversely, doctors and health professionals were considered credible, but not consulted as frequently. The use of five or more information sources increased by almost 60% between the SARS and H1N1 surveys. There was a shift to older, more educated and more affluent respondents between the surveys, most likely caused by a decrease in the use of landlines amongst younger Canadians. It was concluded that people are increasingly using multiple sources of health risk information, presumably in a complementary manner. Subsequently, although using online media is important, this should be used to augment rather than replace more traditional information channels. Efforts should be made to improve knowledge transfer to health care professionals and doctors and provide them with opportunities to be more accessible as information sources. Finally, the future use of telephone surveys needs to account for the changing demographics of the respondents accessed through such surveys.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.