Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26485292›Full record

ArticlePhysiology & behavior2016

BALB/c and SWR inbred mice differ in post-oral fructose appetition as revealed by sugar versus non-nutritive sweetener tests.

Tamar T Kraft, Donald Huang, Melanie Lolier, Deena Warshaw, Sam LaMagna, Elona Natanova, Anthony Sclafani, Richard J Bodnar

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Physiology & behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. SGLT1 sugar transporter/sensor is required for post-oral glucose appetition.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Tamar T KraftBehavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Cluster of the Psychology Doctoral Program, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Donald HuangDepartment of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Melanie LolierDepartment of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Deena WarshawDepartment of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Sam LaMagnaDepartment of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Elona NatanovaDepartment of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Anthony SclafaniBehavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Cluster of the Psychology Doctoral Program, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Richard J BodnarBehavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Cluster of the Psychology Doctoral Program, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA; Department of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA. Electronic address: richard.bodnar@qc.cuny.edu.
Queens College, CUNY · USBrooklyn College · USCity University of New York · USThe Graduate Center, CUNY · US

Funding

Carbohydrate Appetite, Fat Appetite and ObesityR37DK031135 · NIDDK · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI SCLAFANI, ANTHONY · 2001 to 2010
$2.9M
CARBOHYDRATE APPETITE, FAT APPETITE, AND OBESITYR01DK031135 · NIDDK · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI ACKROFF, KAREN, SCLAFANI, ANTHONY · 1986 to 2015
$2.0M
Discovery of Natural Products and Natural Product-Like InhibitorsZ01DK031135 · NIDDK · NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DIABETES AND DIGESTIVE AND KIDNEY DISEASES · PI BEWLEY, CAROLE · 2007 to 2008
$844k
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 DK031135NIDDK NIH HHS DK031135NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK031135NIDDK NIH HHS R37 DK031135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies indicate that C57BL/6J (B6) and FVB inbred mouse strains differ in post-oral fructose conditioning. This was demonstrated by their differential flavor conditioning response to intragastric fructose and their preference for fructose versus a non-nutritive sweetener. The present study extended this analysis to SWR and BALB/c inbred strains which are of interest because they both show robust flavor conditioning responses to fructose. In the first experiment, ad-libitum fed mice were given a series of 2-day, two-bottle preference tests between 8% fructose and a more preferred, but non-nutritive 0.1% sucralose +0.1% saccharin (S+S) solution (tests 1 & 4), and fructose or S+S versus water (tests 2 and 3). In test 1, SWR mice preferred S+S to fructose, and in tests 2 and 3, they preferred both sweeteners to water. In test 4, SWR mice switched their preference and consumed more fructose than S+S. In contrast, ad-libitum fed BALB/c mice strongly preferred S+S to fructose in both tests 1 and 4, although they preferred both sweeteners to water in tests 2 and 3. Food-restricted BALB/c mice also preferred the non-nutritive S+S to fructose in tests 1 and 4. The experience-induced fructose preference reversal observed in SWR, but not BALB/c mice indicates that fructose has a post-oral reinforcing effect in SWR mice as in FVB mice. Because B6 and FVB mice prefer glucose to fructose based on the post-oral actions of the two sugars, the second experiment compared the preferences of SWR and BALB/c mice for 8% glucose and fructose solutions. Ad-libitum fed and food-restricted SWR mice strongly preferred glucose to fructose. In contrast, ad-libitum fed BALB/c mice were indifferent to the sugars, perhaps because of their overall low intakes. Food-restricted BALB/c mice, however, strongly preferred glucose. These findings indicate that SWR and BALB/c mice differ in their preference response to the post-oral actions of fructose.

Indexed as

AnimalsDrug CombinationsFood DeprivationFood PreferencesFructoseGlucoseMaleMiceMice, Inbred BALB CMice, Inbred StrainsReinforcement, PsychologySaccharinSucroseDrug CombinationsFructoseGlucoseSaccharinSucrosetrichlorosucroseFructoseGlucoseLearningSaccharinSucralose

Identifiers

PMID26485292
PMCPMC5575923
OpenAlexW2172590606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.