ArticlePloS one2015
Evaluation of Electrical Impedance as a Biomarker of Myostatin Inhibition in Wild Type and Muscular Dystrophy Mice.
Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- A two-site collaborative study of electrical impedance myography for evaluation of disease progression in murine Duchenne muscular dystrophy models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- Fiber optic Raman spectroscopy for the evaluation of disease state in Duchenne muscular dystrophy: An assessment using the mdx model and human muscle.Muscle & nerve · 2022Article
- Antisense oligonucleotide and adjuvant exercise therapy reverse fatigue in old mice with myotonic dystrophy.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2021Article
- Update on Biomarkers in Spinal Muscular Atrophy.Biomarker insights · 2021Review
- Electrical Impedance Methods in Neuromuscular Assessment: An Overview.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2019Review
- Permittivity of ex vivo healthy and diseased murine skeletal muscle from 10 kHz to 1 MHz.Scientific data · 2019Article
- Separation of Subcutaneous Fat From Muscle in Surface Electrical Impedance Myography Measurements Using Model Component Analysis.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2019Article
- Electrical impedance myography as a biomarker of myostatin inhibition with ActRIIB-mFc: a study in wild-type mice.Future science OA · 2018Article
- Predicting myofiber size with electrical impedance myography: A study in immature mice.Muscle & nerve · 2018Article
- Non-invasive assessment of muscle injury in healthy and dystrophic animals with electrical impedance myography.Muscle & nerve · 2017Article
- Magnetic Resonance Monitoring of Disease Progression in mdx Mice on Different Genetic Backgrounds.The American journal of pathology · 2017Article
- Article
- Electrical Impedance Myography and Its Applications in Neuromuscular Disorders.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2017Review
- Guidelines to electrode positioning for human and animal electrical impedance myography research.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Electrical Impedance Myography to Detect the Effects of Electrical Muscle Stimulation in Wild Type and Mdx Mice.PloS one · 2016Article
- Single and modeled multifrequency electrical impedance myography parameters and their relationship to force production in the ALS SOD1G93A mouse.Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis & frontotemporal degenerationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesNon-invasive and effort independent biomarkers are needed to better assess the effects of drug therapy on healthy muscle and that affected by muscular dystrophy (mdx). Here we evaluated the use of multi-frequency electrical impedance for this purpose with comparison to force and histological parameters.
methodsEight wild-type (wt) and 10 mdx mice were treated weekly with RAP-031 activin type IIB receptor at a dose of 10 mg kg-1 twice weekly for 16 weeks; the investigators were blinded to treatment and disease status. At the completion of treatment, impedance measurements, in situ force measurements, and histology analyses were performed.
resultsAs compared to untreated animals, RAP-031 wt and mdx treated mice had greater body mass (18% and 17%, p < 0.001 respectively) and muscle mass (25% p < 0.05 and 22% p < 0.001, respectively). The Cole impedance parameters in treated wt mice, showed a 24% lower central frequency (p < 0.05) and 19% higher resistance ratio (p < 0.05); no significant differences were observed in the mdx mice. These differences were consistent with those seen in maximum isometric force, which was greater in the wt animals (p < 0.05 at > 70 Hz), but not in the mdx animals. In contrast, maximum force normalized by muscle mass was unchanged in the wt animals and lower in the mdx animals by 21% (p < 0.01). Similarly, myofiber size was only non-significantly higher in treated versus untreated animals (8% p = 0.44 and 12% p = 0.31 for wt and mdx animals, respectively).
conclusionsOur findings demonstrate electrical impedance of muscle reproduce the functional and histological changes associated with myostatin pathway inhibition and do not reflect differences in muscle size or volume. This technique deserves further study in both animal and human therapeutic trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.