Trial reportPLoS neglected tropical diseases2015
A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Intervention Study to Assess the Effect of a Contact Intervention in Reducing Leprosy-Related Stigma in Indonesia.
Trial report in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
38 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Engagement strategies for people living with leprosy: a scoping review of studies published from 1992 to 2024.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2026Pooled it
- Individual and community factors determining delayed leprosy case detection: A systematic review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Pooled it
- Implementation science and stigma reduction interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.BMC medicine · 2019Pooled it
- The impact of leishmaniasis on mental health and psychosocial well-being: A systematic review.PloS one · 2019Pooled it
- Trial
- Fatigue, stigma, and mood in patients with multiple sclerosis: effectiveness of guided imagery.BMC neurology · 2022Trial
- A Structured Intervention for Medical Students Significantly Improves Awareness of Stigmatisation in Visible Chronic Skin Diseases: A Randomised Controlled Trial.Acta dermato-venereologica · 2022Trial
- Effectiveness of a structured short intervention against stigmatisation in chronic visible skin diseases: Results of a controlled trial in future educators.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021Trial
- Assessing the Impact of the Twin Track Socio-Economic Intervention on Reducing Leprosy-Related Stigma in Cirebon District, Indonesia.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Trial
- Mental health, social determinants and One Health in skin neglected tropical diseases (NTDs): A scoping review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Sharing is healing: The power of storytelling to transform mental health in the field of neglected tropical diseases.PLOS mental health · 2025Article
- Community-based psychosocial support interventions to reduce stigma and improve mental health of people with infectious diseases: a scoping review.Infectious diseases of poverty · 2024Article
- Investigation of community knowledge, attitudes and stigma towards leprosy in Nigeria: a mixed-methods study.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2024Article
- Effectiveness of Sensitization Campaigns in Reducing Leprosy-Related Stigma in Rural Togo: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2024Article
- The role of a community conversation intervention in reducing stigma related to lower limb lymphoedema in Northern Ethiopia.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Social contact as a strategy to reduce stigma in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and expert perspectives.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Interventions to reduce leprosy related stigma: A systematic review.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Integrated services for neglected tropical diseases and mental health: pilot study assessing acceptability, feasibility and attitudes in Benue State, Nigeria.International health · 2023Article
- Community-level determinants of stakeholder perceptions of community stigma toward people with opioid use disorders, harm reduction services and treatment in the HEALing Communities Study.The International journal on drug policy · 2023Article
- Measuring leprosy case detection delay and associated factors in Indonesia: a community-based study.BMC infectious diseases · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCan deliberate interaction between the public and persons affected by leprosy reduce stigmatization? The study described in this paper hypothesises that it can and assesses the effectiveness of a 'contact intervention'. METHODS/PRINCIPAL
findingsThis cluster-randomized controlled intervention study is part of the Stigma Assessment and Reduction of Impact (SARI) project conducted in Cirebon District, Indonesia. Testimonies, participatory videos and comics given or made by people affected by leprosy were used as methods to facilitate a dialogue during so-called 'contact events'. A mix of seven quantitative and qualitative methods, including two scales to assess aspects of stigma named the SDS and EMIC-CSS, were used to establish a baseline regarding stigma and knowledge of leprosy, monitor the implementation and assess the impact of the contact events. The study sample were community members selected using different sampling methods. The baseline shows a lack of knowledge about leprosy, a high level of stigma and contrasting examples of support. In total, 91 contact events were organised in 62 villages, directly reaching 4,443 community members (mean 49 per event). The interview data showed that knowledge about leprosy increased and that negative attitudes reduced. The adjusted mean total score of the EMIC-CSS reduced by 4.95 points among respondents who had attended a contact event (n = 58; p < 0.001, effect size = 0.75) compared to the score at baseline (n = 213); for the SDS this was 3.56 (p < 0.001, effect size = 0.81). About 75% of those attending a contact event said they shared the information with others (median 10 persons). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: The contact intervention was effective in increasing knowledge and improving public attitudes regarding leprosy. It is relatively easy to replicate elsewhere and does not require expensive technology. More research is needed to improve scalability. The effectiveness of a contact intervention to reduce stigma against other neglected tropical diseases and conditions should be evaluated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.