Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26485003›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2015

A Pan-Cancer Catalogue of Cancer Driver Protein Interaction Interfaces.

Eduard Porta-Pardo, Luz Garcia-Alonso, Thomas Hrabe, Joaquin Dopazo, Adam Godzik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 81 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
81citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

81 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 149 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

21 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Eduard Porta-PardoBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Luz Garcia-AlonsoEuropean Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Thomas HrabeBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Joaquin DopazoComputational Genomics Department, Centro de Investigación Príncipe Felipe (CIPF), Valencia, Spain; Functional Genomics Node, (INB) at CIPF, Valencia, Spain; Bioinformatics of Rare Diseases (BIER), CIBER de Enfermedades Raras (CIBERER), Valencia, Spain.
Adam GodzikBioinformatics and Systems Biology Program, Sanford-Burnham Medical Research Institute, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute · USCentre for Biomedical Network Research on Rare Diseases · ESEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GB

Funding

Tumor Microenvironment and Cancer ImmunologyP30CA030199 · NCI · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI Michael Jackson · 1985 to 2026
$107.2M
Development of the flexible comparative modeling toolkitR01GM101457 · NIGMS · SANFORD BURNHAM PREBYS MEDICAL DISCOVERY INSTITUTE · PI GODZIK, ADAM · 2012 to 2015
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA030199NIGMS NIH HHS GM101457NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101457
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite their importance in maintaining the integrity of all cellular pathways, the role of mutations on protein-protein interaction (PPI) interfaces as cancer drivers has not been systematically studied. Here we analyzed the mutation patterns of the PPI interfaces from 10,028 proteins in a pan-cancer cohort of 5,989 tumors from 23 projects of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) to find interfaces enriched in somatic missense mutations. To that end we use e-Driver, an algorithm to analyze the mutation distribution of specific protein functional regions. We identified 103 PPI interfaces enriched in somatic cancer mutations. 32 of these interfaces are found in proteins coded by known cancer driver genes. The remaining 71 interfaces are found in proteins that have not been previously identified as cancer drivers even that, in most cases, there is an extensive literature suggesting they play an important role in cancer. Finally, we integrate these findings with clinical information to show how tumors apparently driven by the same gene have different behaviors, including patient outcomes, depending on which specific interfaces are mutated.

Indexed as

AnimalsBase SequenceBiomarkers, TumorCatalogs as TopicChromosome MappingComputer SimulationDNA Mutational AnalysisGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataMutationNeoplasm ProteinsNeoplasmsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideProtein Interaction MappingBiomarkers, TumorNeoplasm Proteins

Identifiers

PMID26485003
PMCPMC4616621
OpenAlexW2950945059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.