Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26484764›Full record

Observational studyPLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Surveillance of Human Echinococcosis in Castilla-Leon (Spain) between 2000-2012.

Amparo Lopez-Bernus, Moncef Belhassen-García, Montserrat Alonso-Sardón, Adela Carpio-Perez, Virginia Velasco-Tirado, Ángela Romero-Alegria, Antonio Muro, Miguel Cordero-Sánchez, Javier Pardo-Lledias

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Amparo Lopez-BernusServicio de Medicina Interna, CAUSA, CIETUS, IBSAL, Salamanca. Spain.
Moncef Belhassen-GarcíaServicio de Medicina Interna, Sección de Enfermedades Infecciosas, CAUSA, CIETUS, IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain.
Montserrat Alonso-SardónÁrea de Medicina Preventiva y Salud Publica, CIETUS, IBSAL, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Adela Carpio-PerezServicio de Medicina Interna, CAUSA, CIETUS, IBSAL, Salamanca. Spain.
Virginia Velasco-TiradoServicio de Medicina Interna, CAUSA, CIETUS, IBSAL, Salamanca. Spain.
Ángela Romero-AlegriaServicio de Medicina Interna, CAUSA, CIETUS, IBSAL, Salamanca. Spain.
Antonio MuroLaboratorio de Inmunología Parasitaria y Molecular, CIETUS, IBSAL, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain.
Miguel Cordero-SánchezServicio de Medicina Interna, Sección de Enfermedades Infecciosas, CAUSA, CIETUS, IBSAL, Salamanca, Spain.
Javier Pardo-LlediasServicio de Medicina Interna, CAUPA Hospital General de Palencia "Río Carrión," Palencia, Spain.
Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca · ESHospital Rio Carrion · ESUniversidad de Salamanca · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCystic echinococcosis (CE) is an important health problem in many areas of the world including the Mediterranean region. However, the real CE epidemiological situation is not well established. In fact, it is possible that CE is a re-emerging disease due to the weakness of current control programs. METHODOLOGY: We performed a retrospective observational study of inpatients diagnosed with CE from January 2000 to December 2012 in the Western Spain Public Health-Care System. PRINCIPAL

findingsDuring the study period, 5510 cases of CE were diagnosed and 3161 (57.4%) of the cases were males. The age mean and standard deviation were 67.8 ± 16.98 years old, respectively, and 634 patients (11.5%) were younger than 45 years old. A total of 1568 patients (28.5%) had CE as the primary diagnosis, and it was most frequently described in patients <45 years old. Futhermore, a secondary diagnosis of CE was usually found in patients >70 year old associated with other causes of comorbidity. The period incidence rate was 17 cases per 105 person-years and was significantly higher when compared to the incidence declared through the Notifiable Disease System (1.88 cases per 105 person-years; p<0.001).

conclusionsCE in western Spain is an underestimated parasitic disease. It has an active transmission, with an occurrence in pediatric cases, but has decreased in the recent years. The systematic search of Hospital Discharge Records of the National Health System Register (HDR) may be a more accurate method than other methods for the estimation of the incidence of CE in endemic areas.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge DistributionChildChild, PreschoolEchinococcosisFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMaleMediterranean RegionMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID26484764
PMCPMC4618931
OpenAlexW2148624548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.