Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26484663›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Pangenome Analysis of Burkholderia pseudomallei: Genome Evolution Preserves Gene Order despite High Recombination Rates.

Senanu M Spring-Pearson, Joshua K Stone, Adina Doyle, Christopher J Allender, Richard T Okinaka, Mark Mayo, Stacey M Broomall, Jessica M Hill, Mark A Karavis, Kyle S Hubbard and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characterization of an isogenicInfection and immunity · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Burkholderia pseudomallei and melioidosis.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2024
    Review
  8. Genetic diversity, determinants, and dissemination ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  9. Detection ofFrontiers in public health · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Pan-Genome of the GenusFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Human Melioidosis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. An Evolutionary Arms Race BetweenFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Senanu M Spring-PearsonDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, United States of America.
Joshua K StoneDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, United States of America.
Adina DoyleDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, United States of America.
Christopher J AllenderDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, United States of America.
Richard T OkinakaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, United States of America.
Mark MayoMenzies School of Health Research and Infectious Disease Department, Royal Darwin Hospital. Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
Stacey M BroomallBioSciences Division, Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States of America.
Jessica M HillBioSciences Division, Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States of America.
Mark A KaravisBioSciences Division, Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States of America.
Kyle S HubbardBioSciences Division, Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States of America.
Joseph M InsalacoBioSciences Division, Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States of America.
Lauren A McNewBioSciences Division, Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States of America.
C Nicole RosenzweigBioSciences Division, Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States of America.
Henry S GibbonsBioSciences Division, Edgewood Chemical Biological Center, Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, United States of America.
Bart J CurrieMenzies School of Health Research and Infectious Disease Department, Royal Darwin Hospital. Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia.
David M WagnerDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, United States of America.
Paul KeimDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, United States of America.
Apichai TuanyokDepartment of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, United States of America; Department of Infectious Diseases and Pathology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
U.S. Army Combat Capabilities Development Command Chemical Biological CenterNorthern Arizona University · USMenzies School of Health Research · AURoyal Darwin Hospital · AUUniversity of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pangenomic diversity in Burkholderia pseudomallei is high, with approximately 5.8% of the genome consisting of genomic islands. Genomic islands are known hotspots for recombination driven primarily by site-specific recombination associated with tRNAs. However, recombination rates in other portions of the genome are also high, a feature we expected to disrupt gene order. We analyzed the pangenome of 37 isolates of B. pseudomallei and demonstrate that the pangenome is 'open', with approximately 136 new genes identified with each new genome sequenced, and that the global core genome consists of 4568±16 homologs. Genes associated with metabolism were statistically overrepresented in the core genome, and genes associated with mobile elements, disease, and motility were primarily associated with accessory portions of the pangenome. The frequency distribution of genes present in between 1 and 37 of the genomes analyzed matches well with a model of genome evolution in which 96% of the genome has very low recombination rates but 4% of the genome recombines readily. Using homologous genes among pairs of genomes, we found that gene order was highly conserved among strains, despite the high recombination rates previously observed. High rates of gene transfer and recombination are incompatible with retaining gene order unless these processes are either highly localized to specific sites within the genome, or are characterized by symmetrical gene gain and loss. Our results demonstrate that both processes occur: localized recombination introduces many new genes at relatively few sites, and recombination throughout the genome generates the novel multi-locus sequence types previously observed while preserving gene order.

Indexed as

Gene OrderAlgorithmsBurkholderia pseudomalleiEvolution, MolecularGenes, BacterialGenetic VariationGene Transfer, HorizontalGenome, BacterialModels, GeneticRecombination, GeneticSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID26484663
PMCPMC4613141
OpenAlexW1809453021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.