Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26484426›Full record

Trial reportJournal of palliative medicine2015

Gender Differences in Caregiving at End of Life: Implications for Hospice Teams.

Karla T Washington, Kenneth C Pike, George Demiris, Debra Parker Oliver, David L Albright, Alexandria M Lewis

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of palliative medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A burden shared: the financial, psychological, and health-related consequences borne by family members and caregivers of people with cancer in India.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Expressing grief through metaphors: family caregivers' experience of care and grief during the Covid-19 pandemic.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021
    Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karla T Washington1 Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri , Columbia, Missouri.
Kenneth C Pike2 Department of Psychosocial Nursing and Community Health, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
George Demiris3 Department of Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Services, School of Nursing, University of Washington , Seattle, Washington.
Debra Parker Oliver1 Department of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Missouri , Columbia, Missouri.
David L Albright5 School of Social Work, University of Alabama , Tuscaloosa, Alabama.
Alexandria M Lewis6 School of Social Work, University of Missouri , Columbia, Missouri.
University of Missouri · USUniversity of Alabama · USUniversity of Washington Medical Center · US

Funding

A Problem Solving Intervention for Hospice CaregiversR01NR012213 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DEMIRIS, GEORGE · 2011 to 2021
$4.2M
NINR NIH HHS R01NR012213
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResearchers have identified important gender differences in the experience of caring for a family member or friend living with advanced disease; however, trends suggest that these differences may be diminishing over time in response to changing gender roles. In addition, while many studies have found caregiving experiences and outcomes to be poorer among female caregivers, noteworthy exceptions exist.

objectiveThe primary aim of this exploratory study was to determine how, if at all, current day caregiving at end of life varies by gender.

methodsWe conducted a secondary analysis of data from a multisite randomized controlled trial of a family caregiving intervention performed between 2010 and 2014. We compared female and male hospice family caregivers on baseline variables using χ(2) tests for association of categorical variables and t-tests for continuous variables. Our sample included 289 family caregivers of individuals receiving services from one of two hospice agencies located in the northwestern United States. Demographic data and other categorical variables of interest were provided via caregiver self-report using an instrument created specifically for this study. Reaction to caregiving and caregiving burden were measured using the Caregiver Reaction Assessment (CRA).

resultsAs it related to caregiving, females had significantly lower self-esteem and more negative impact on their schedule, health, and family support than males. No gender differences were detected with regard to the impact of caregiving on individuals' finances.

conclusionsDespite changing social expectations, pronounced gender differences persist in caregiving at the end of life.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overCaregiversFamilyFemaleGender IdentityHospice CareHumansMaleMiddle AgedSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID26484426
PMCPMC4677542
OpenAlexW2150300487

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.