ArticleData in brief2015
Data from subjects receiving intrathecal laronidase for cervical spinal stenosis due to mucopolysaccharidosis type I.
Article in Data in brief, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Targeted enzyme delivery systems in lysosomal disorders: an innovative form of therapy for mucopolysaccharidosis.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2019Review
- Lysosomal Leukodystrophies Lysosomal Storage Diseases Associated With White Matter Abnormalities.Journal of child neurology · 2019Review
- Pathogenesis and treatment of spine disease in the mucopolysaccharidoses.Molecular genetics and metabolism · 2016Review
- Safety of laronidase delivered into the spinal canal for treatment of cervical stenosis in mucopolysaccharidosis I.Molecular genetics and metabolismArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Five subjects with mucopolysaccharidosis type I and symptomatic cervical spinal stenosis received intrathecal laronidase in a 4-month pilot study and/or a 12-month extension study [1]. Clinical descriptions of study subjects, nonserious adverse events, individual data tables, and scoring system methods are provided. There were ten nonserious adverse events that occurred in more than one study subject. Somatosensory evoked potentials were absent in two subjects and normal in two subjects, limiting their utility as an endpoint. There were no significant changes in magnetic resonance imaging of cervical spinal cord or brain, pulmonary function tests, or cerebrospinal fluid opening pressure. These data are presented along with the scoring methods used in evaluation of the study subjects.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.