Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26484313›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2015

Current Status of CTCs as Liquid Biopsy in Lung Cancer and Future Directions.

Zhuo Zhang, Nithya Ramnath, Sunitha Nagrath

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Microfluidics for the Isolation and Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhuo ZhangDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI , USA.
Nithya RamnathDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI , USA ; Veterans Administration Ann Arbor Healthcare System , Ann Arbor, MI , USA.
Sunitha NagrathDepartment of Chemical Engineering, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI , USA ; Translational Oncology Program, University of Michigan , Ann Arbor, MI , USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have garnered a lot of attention in the past few decades. Isolation of these rare cells from the billions of blood cells has been a challenge until recent times. With the advent of new sensitive technologies that permit live cell isolation and downstream genomic analysis, the existing paradigm of CTC research has evolved to explore clinical utility of these cells. CTCs have been identified as prognostic and pharmacodynamic biomarkers in many solid tumors, including lung cancer. As a means of liquid biopsy, CTCs could play a major role in the development of personalized medicine and targeted therapies. This review discusses the state of various isolation strategies, cell separation techniques and key studies that illustrate the application of liquid biopsy to lung cancer.

Indexed as

circulating tumor cellsliquid biopsylung cancernon-small-cell lung cancerprognostic biomarkersreview of literaturesmall-cell lung cancer

Identifiers

PMID26484313
PMCPMC4588111

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.