Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26484212›Full record

ArticleGenomics data2015

Illumina-based analysis of bacterial community in Khuangcherapuk cave of Mizoram, Northeast India.

Surajit De Mandal, Amrita Kumari Panda, Esther Lalnunmawii, Satpal Singh Bisht, Nachimuthu Senthil Kumar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics data, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Microbial roles in cave biogeochemical cycling.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Surajit De MandalDepartment of Biotechnology, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, Mizoram, India.
Amrita Kumari PandaDepartment of Biotechnology, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, Mizoram, India.
Esther LalnunmawiiDepartment of Biotechnology, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, Mizoram, India.
Satpal Singh BishtDepartment of Biotechnology, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, Mizoram, India.
Nachimuthu Senthil KumarDepartment of Biotechnology, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796004, Mizoram, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacterial community of the Khuangcherapuk cave sediment was assessed by Illumina amplicon sequencing. The metagenome comprised of 533,120 raw reads with an average base quality (Phred score) 36.75 and G + C content is 57.61%. A total of 18 bacterial phyla were detected with following abundant genus - Mycobacterium (21.72%), Rhodococcus (7.09%), Alteromonas (1.42%), Holomonas (0.7%) and Salinisphaera (0.20%). Majority portion of the sequences (68%) is unclassified at the genus level indicating the possibilities for the presence of novel species in this cave. This study reports the cave bacterial diversity from the biodiversity hotspot region of Eastern Himalayas. Metagenome sequence data are available at NCBI under the Bioproject database with accession no. SRP056890.

Indexed as

IlluminaKhuangcherapuk caveMetagenome

Identifiers

PMID26484212
PMCPMC4583610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.