ArticleGenomics data2015
Comparative genomic analysis and phenazine production of Pseudomonas chlororaphis, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium.
Article in Genomics data, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
30 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predicting bacterial-mediated entomopathogenicity through comparative genomics and statistical modeling.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Review
- Biocontrol and Growth Promotion of Rice byJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Metabolic Fluxes Using Deep Learning Based on Enzyme Variations:International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Profiling Metabolites with Antifungal Activities from Endophytic Plant-Beneficial Strains ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Antifungal metabolites produced by Pseudomonas hunanensis SPT26 effective in biocontrol of fusarium wilt of Lycopersicum esculentum under saline conditions.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2024Article
- Genome analysis of Pseudomonas strain 4B with broad antagonistic activity against toxigenic fungi.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024Article
- Self-Assembled Nanocoatings Protect Microbial Fertilizers for Climate-Resilient Agriculture.JACS Au · 2023Article
- Recent Developments in the Biological Activities, Bioproduction, and Applications ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Plant growth-promoting effect and genomic analysis of the P. putida LWPZF isolated from C. japonicum rhizosphere.AMB Express · 2022Article
- Comparative genomics of theMicrobial genomics · 2021Article
- Prospect of phytoremediation combined with other approaches for remediation of heavy metal-polluted soils.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2020Review
- Article
- Soil Application of a Formulated Biocontrol Rhizobacterium,Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Comparative genomics of Paraburkholderia kururiensis and its potential in bioremediation, biofertilization, and biocontrol of plant pathogens.MicrobiologyOpen · 2019Article
- Complete genome sequence of3 Biotech · 2019Article
- Fitness Features Involved in the Biocontrol Interaction ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2019Review
- Rhizosphere pseudomonads as probiotics improving plant health.Molecular plant pathology · 2018Review
- Complete Genome Sequence of Cd(II)-Resistant Arthrobacter sp. PGP41, a Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium with Potential in Microbe-Assisted Phytoremediation.Current microbiology · 2018Article
- Metabolomics analysis of Pseudomonas chlororaphis JK12 algicidal activity under aerobic and micro-aerobic culture condition.AMB Express · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pseudomonas chlororaphis HT66, a plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium that produces phenazine-1-carboxamide with high yield, was compared with three genomic sequenced P. chlororaphis strains, GP72, 30-84 and O6. The genome sizes of four strains vary from 6.66 to 7.30 Mb. Comparisons of predicted coding sequences indicated 4833 conserved genes in 5869-6455 protein-encoding genes. Phylogenetic analysis showed that the four strains are closely related to each other. Its competitive colonization indicates that P. chlororaphis can adapt well to its environment. No virulence or virulence-related factor was found in P. chlororaphis. All of the four strains could synthesize antimicrobial metabolites including different phenazines and insecticidal protein FitD. Some genes related to the regulation of phenazine biosynthesis were detected among the four strains. It was shown that P. chlororaphis is a safe PGPR in agricultural application and could also be used to produce some phenazine antibiotics with high-yield.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.