ReviewFrontiers in neurology2015
Facilitating the Validation of Novel Protein Biomarkers for Dementia: An Optimal Workflow for the Development of Sandwich Immunoassays.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Peripheral Blood-Based Gene Expression Studies in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Pooled it
- Structural insights into antibody-antibody interactions in sandwich ELISA: implications for assay development and performance.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Fluid biomarkers in familial frontotemporal dementia: progress and prospects.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Proteomics techniques in protein biomarker discovery.Quantitative biology (Beijing, China) · 2024Review
- Discovery of novel CSF biomarkers to predict progression in dementia using machine learning.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Clinical application of serum biomarkers for detecting and monitoring of chronic plaque psoriasis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2023Review
- Bioinformatics tools and data resources for assay development of fluid protein biomarkers.Biomarker research · 2022Review
- New developments of biofluid-based biomarkers for routine diagnosis and disease trajectories in frontotemporal dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2022Review
- Phosphatidylethanolamine Binding Protein 1 (PEBP1) in Alzheimer's Disease: ELISA Development and Clinical Validation.Journal of Alzheimer's disease : JAD · 2022Article
- Article
- Direct Kinetic Fingerprinting for High-Accuracy Single-Molecule Counting of Diverse Disease Biomarkers.Accounts of chemical research · 2021Article
- Paving the Way toward Personalized Medicine: Current Advances and Challenges in Multi-OMICS Approach in Autism Spectrum Disorder for Biomarkers Discovery and Patient Stratification.Journal of personalized medicine · 2021Review
- Aβ34 is a BACE1-derived degradation intermediate associated with amyloid clearance and Alzheimer's disease progression.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Article
- CSF Tau proteins reduce misdiagnosis of sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease suspected cases with inconclusive 14-3-3 result.Journal of neurology · 2016Article
- Evolutionary development of embryonic cerebrospinal fluid composition and regulation: an open research field with implications for brain development and function.Fluids and barriers of the CNS · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Different neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD) and frontotemporal dementia (FTD), lead to dementia syndromes. Dementia will pose a huge impact on society and thus it is essential to develop novel tools that are able to detect the earliest, most sensitive, discriminative, and dynamic biomarkers for each of the disorders. To date, the most common assays used in large-scale protein biomarker analysis are enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA), such as the sandwich immunoassays, which are sensitive, practical, and easily implemented. However, due to the novelty of many candidate biomarkers identified during proteomics screening, such assays or the antibodies that specifically recognize the desired marker are often not available. The development and optimization of a new ELISA should be carried out with considerable caution since a poor planning can be costly, ineffective, time consuming, and it may lead to a misinterpretation of the findings. Previous guidelines described either the overall biomarker development in more general terms (i.e., the process from biomarker discovery to validation) or the specific steps of performing an ELISA procedure. However, a workflow describing and guiding the main issues in the development of a novel ELISA is missing. Here, we describe a specific and detailed workflow to develop and validate new ELISA for a successful and reliable validation of novel dementia biomarkers. The proposed workflow highlights the main issues in the development of an ELISA and covers several critical aspects, including production, screening, and selection of specific antibodies until optimal fine-tuning of the assay. Although these recommendations are designed to analyze novel biomarkers for dementia in cerebrospinal fluid, they are generally applicable for the development of immunoassays for biomarkers in other human body fluids or tissues. This workflow is designed to maximize the quality of the developed ELISA using a time- and cost-efficient strategy. This will facilitate the validation of the dementia biomarker candidates ultimately allowing accurate diagnostic conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.