Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26483645›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in systems neuroscience2015

fMRI investigation of response inhibition, emotion, impulsivity, and clinical high-risk behavior in adolescents.

Matthew R G Brown, James R A Benoit, Michal Juhás, Ericson Dametto, Tiffanie T Tse, Marnie MacKay, Bhaskar Sen, Alan M Carroll, Oleksandr Hodlevskyy, Peter H Silverstone and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The effect of learning to drum on behavior and brain function in autistic adolescents.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Setting the occasion for adolescent inhibitory control.Neurobiology of learning and memory · 2017
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Matthew R G BrownDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada ; Department of Computing Science, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada.
James R A BenoitDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Michal JuhásDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Ericson DamettoDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Tiffanie T TseDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Marnie MacKayDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Bhaskar SenDepartment of Computing Science, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Alan M CarrollDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Oleksandr HodlevskyyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Peter H SilverstoneDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Florin DolcosDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada ; Psychology Department, Neuroscience Program, and the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign Urbana, IL, USA.
Serdar M DursunDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Andrew J GreenshawDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Alberta Edmonton, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-risk behavior in adolescents is associated with injury, mental health problems, and poor outcomes in later life. Improved understanding of the neurobiology of high-risk behavior and impulsivity shows promise for informing clinical treatment and prevention as well as policy to better address high-risk behavior. We recruited 21 adolescents (age 14-17) with a wide range of high-risk behavior tendencies, including medically high-risk participants recruited from psychiatric clinics. Risk tendencies were assessed using the Adolescent Risk Behavior Screen (ARBS). ARBS risk scores correlated highly (0.78) with impulsivity scores from the Barratt Impulsivity scale (BIS). Participants underwent 4.7 Tesla functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while performing an emotional Go/NoGo task. This task presented an aversive or neutral distractor image simultaneously with each Go or NoGo stimulus. Risk behavior and impulsivity tendencies exhibited similar but not identical associations with fMRI activation patterns in prefrontal brain regions. We interpret these results as reflecting differences in response inhibition, emotional stimulus processing, and emotion regulation in relation to participant risk behavior tendencies and impulsivity levels. The results are consistent with high impulsivity playing an important role in determining high risk tendencies in this sample containing clinically high-risk adolescents.

Indexed as

adolescentARBSemotional Go/NoGohigh-risk behaviorimpulsivityresponse inhibition

Identifiers

PMID26483645
PMCPMC4586270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.