ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2015
Corticofugal projection patterns of whisker sensorimotor cortex to the sensory trigeminal nuclei.
Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-range circuit of the mouse spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis.The journal of headache and pain · 2026Article
- Organization and development of bilateral somatosensory feedback projections in mice.iScience · 2025Article
- Spatially integrated cortico-subcortical tracing data for analyses of rodent brain topographical organization.Scientific data · 2024Article
- The trigeminal pathways.Journal of neurology · 2022Review
- Article
- Interactions of Whisking and Touch Signals in the Rat Brainstem.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021Article
- Calcitonin gene-related peptide facilitates sensitization of the vestibular nucleus in a rat model of chronic migraine.The journal of headache and pain · 2020Article
- Orofacial Movements Involve Parallel Corticobulbar Projections from Motor Cortex to Trigeminal Premotor Nuclei.Neuron · 2019Article
- Highlights from the 28th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Neural Control of Movement.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018Article
- Cortical modulation of sensory flow during active touch in the rat whisker system.Nature communications · 2018Article
- Primary Tactile Thalamus Spiking Reflects Cognitive Signals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Circuits in the rodent brainstem that control whisking in concert with other orofacial motor actions.Neuroscience · 2018Review
- Cortical Regulation of Nociception of the Trigeminal Nucleus Caudalis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017Article
- Relationships between structure, in vivo function and long-range axonal target of cortical pyramidal tract neurons.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Single-axon level morphological analysis of corticofugal projection neurons in mouse barrel field.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortices project to several trigeminal sensory nuclei. One putative function of these corticofugal projections is the gating of sensory transmission through the trigeminal principal nucleus (Pr5), and some have proposed that S1 and S2 project differentially to the spinal trigeminal subnuclei, which have inhibitory circuits that could inhibit or disinhibit the output projections of Pr5. Very little, however, is known about the origin of sensorimotor corticofugal projections and their patterns of termination in the various trigeminal nuclei. We addressed this issue by injecting anterograde tracers in S1, S2 and primary motor (M1) cortices, and quantitatively characterizing the distribution of labeled terminals within the entire rostro-caudal chain of trigeminal sub-nuclei. We confirmed our anterograde tracing results by injecting retrograde tracers at various rostro-caudal levels within the trigeminal sensory nuclei to determine the position of retrogradely labeled cortical cells with respect to S1 barrel cortex. Our results demonstrate that S1 and S2 projections terminate in largely overlapping regions but show some significant differences. Whereas S1 projection terminals tend to cluster within the principal trigeminal (Pr5), caudal spinal trigeminal interpolaris (Sp5ic), and the dorsal spinal trigeminal caudalis (Sp5c), S2 projection terminals are distributed in a continuum across all trigeminal nuclei. Contrary to the view that sensory gating could be mediated by differential activation of inhibitory interconnections between the spinal trigeminal subnuclei, we observed that projections from S1 and S2 are largely overlapping in these subnuclei despite the differences noted earlier.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.