Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26483640›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2015

Corticofugal projection patterns of whisker sensorimotor cortex to the sensory trigeminal nuclei.

Jared B Smith, Glenn D R Watson, Kevin D Alloway, Cornelius Schwarz, Shubhodeep Chakrabarti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The trigeminal pathways.Journal of neurology · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Interactions of Whisking and Touch Signals in the Rat Brainstem.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Primary Tactile Thalamus Spiking Reflects Cognitive Signals.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Cortical Regulation of Nociception of the Trigeminal Nucleus Caudalis.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jared B SmithDepartment of Engineering Science and Mechanics, Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA, USA ; Center for Neural Engineering, Huck Institute of Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA, USA.
Glenn D R WatsonCenter for Neural Engineering, Huck Institute of Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA, USA ; Department of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine Hershey, PA, USA.
Kevin D AllowayCenter for Neural Engineering, Huck Institute of Life Sciences, Pennsylvania State University University Park, PA, USA ; Department of Neural and Behavioral Sciences, Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine Hershey, PA, USA.
Cornelius SchwarzDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen Tübingen, Germany ; Systems Neurophysiology, Werner Reichardt Center for Integrative Neurosciences, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen Tübingen, Germany.
Shubhodeep ChakrabartiDepartment of Cognitive Neurology, Hertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen Tübingen, Germany ; Systems Neurophysiology, Werner Reichardt Center for Integrative Neurosciences, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary (S1) and secondary (S2) somatosensory cortices project to several trigeminal sensory nuclei. One putative function of these corticofugal projections is the gating of sensory transmission through the trigeminal principal nucleus (Pr5), and some have proposed that S1 and S2 project differentially to the spinal trigeminal subnuclei, which have inhibitory circuits that could inhibit or disinhibit the output projections of Pr5. Very little, however, is known about the origin of sensorimotor corticofugal projections and their patterns of termination in the various trigeminal nuclei. We addressed this issue by injecting anterograde tracers in S1, S2 and primary motor (M1) cortices, and quantitatively characterizing the distribution of labeled terminals within the entire rostro-caudal chain of trigeminal sub-nuclei. We confirmed our anterograde tracing results by injecting retrograde tracers at various rostro-caudal levels within the trigeminal sensory nuclei to determine the position of retrogradely labeled cortical cells with respect to S1 barrel cortex. Our results demonstrate that S1 and S2 projections terminate in largely overlapping regions but show some significant differences. Whereas S1 projection terminals tend to cluster within the principal trigeminal (Pr5), caudal spinal trigeminal interpolaris (Sp5ic), and the dorsal spinal trigeminal caudalis (Sp5c), S2 projection terminals are distributed in a continuum across all trigeminal nuclei. Contrary to the view that sensory gating could be mediated by differential activation of inhibitory interconnections between the spinal trigeminal subnuclei, we observed that projections from S1 and S2 are largely overlapping in these subnuclei despite the differences noted earlier.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemaleMaleNeural PathwaysNeuroanatomical Tract-Tracing TechniquesRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySomatosensory CortexTrigeminal Motor NucleusTrigeminal Nucleus, SpinalVibrissaeanterograde tracingbarrel cortexcorticofugal pathwaysretrograde tracingtrigeminal nucleiwhisker

Identifiers

PMID26483640
PMCPMC4588702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.