Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26483532›Full record

ArticlePhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences2015

Identifying bipolar knapping in the Mesolithic site of Font del Ros (northeast Iberia).

Xavier Roda Gilabert, Rafael Mora, Jorge Martínez-Moreno

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Percussive technology in human evolution: an introduction to a comparative approach in fossil and living primates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
  4. The development of plant food processing in the Levant: insights from use-wear analysis of Early Epipalaeolithic ground stone tools.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xavier Roda GilabertCentre d'Estudis del Patrimoni Arqueològic de la Prehistoria (CEPAP), Facultat de Filosofia i Lletres, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain javier.roda@uab.cat.
Rafael MoraCentre d'Estudis del Patrimoni Arqueològic de la Prehistoria (CEPAP), Facultat de Filosofia i Lletres, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7824-6818
Jorge Martínez-MorenoCentre d'Estudis del Patrimoni Arqueològic de la Prehistoria (CEPAP), Facultat de Filosofia i Lletres, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra 08193, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6326-7058

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite recent advances in the identification of bipolar knapping, its role in many sites is not well known. We propose to assess the significance of this technique in the context of changes that occur in the Mesolithic. A lithic assemblage was recovered from unit SG at Font del Ros (Catalunya, Spain) in which pitted stones, cores and products arising from bipolar reduction (flakes, fragments and splintered pieces) were identified. This study indicates that the bipolar technique is fundamental in the settlement. These results are key to defining the organization of Holocene hunter-gatherer subsistence in northeast Iberia.

Indexed as

Tool Use BehaviorAnimalsArchaeologyBiological EvolutionCultural EvolutionHistory, AncientHominidaeHumansSpainbipolar knappingIberian peninsulalithic technologymacrolithic toolsMesolithic

Identifiers

PMID26483532
PMCPMC4614717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.