Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26483171›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical informatics2015

Implications of non-stationarity on predictive modeling using EHRs.

Kenneth Jung, Nigam H Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical informatics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Pathophysiological Features in Electronic Medical Records Sustain Model Performance under Temporal Dataset Shift.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. High-fidelity phenotyping: richness and freedom from bias.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2018
    Article
  18. Scalable Electronic Phenotyping For Studying Patient Comorbidities.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Electronic phenotyping with APHRODITE and the Observational Health Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI) data network.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kenneth JungProgram in Biomedical Informatics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States. Electronic address: kjung@stanford.edu.
Nigam H ShahCenter for Biomedical Informatics Research, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.

Funding

STANFORD COMPOSITE(RMI)U54HG004028 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2005 to 2014
$36.2M
Methods for generalized ontology terms enrichment analysisR01LM011369 · NLM · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAH, NIGAM H · 2013 to 2020
$5.0M
Mining health data for drug safety profilesR01GM101430 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SHAH, NIGAM H · 2013 to 2017
$2.9M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004028NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM101430NLM NIH HHS R01 LM011369
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly increasing volume of clinical information captured in Electronic Health Records (EHRs) has led to the application of increasingly sophisticated models for purposes such as disease subtype discovery and predictive modeling. However, increasing adoption of EHRs implies that in the near future, much of the data available for such purposes will be from a time period during which both the practice of medicine and the clinical use of EHRs are in flux due to historic changes in both technology and incentives. In this work, we explore the implications of this phenomenon, called non-stationarity, on predictive modeling. We focus on the problem of predicting delayed wound healing using data available in the EHR during the first week of care in outpatient wound care centers, using a large dataset covering over 150,000 individual wounds and 59,958 patients seen over a period of four years. We manipulate the degree of non-stationarity seen by the model development process by changing the way data is split into training and test sets. We demonstrate that non-stationarity can lead to quite different conclusions regarding the relative merits of different models with respect to predictive power and calibration of their posterior probabilities. Under the non-stationarity exhibited in this dataset, the performance advantage of complex methods such as stacking relative to the best simple classifier disappears. Ignoring non-stationarity can thus lead to sub-optimal model selection in this task.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsModels, TheoreticalDiffusion of InnovationHumansWound HealingData miningMachine learningPredictive modelPrognostic modelWound healing

Identifiers

PMID26483171
PMCPMC4684770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.