Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26482930›Full record

ArticleCancer discovery2015

Harnessing Connectivity in a Large-Scale Small-Molecule Sensitivity Dataset.

Brinton Seashore-Ludlow, Matthew G Rees, Jaime H Cheah, Murat Cokol, Edmund V Price, Matthew E Coletti, Victor Jones, Nicole E Bodycombe, Christian K Soule, Joshua Gould and 16 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer discovery, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 512 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
512citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
33.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

512 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 868 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Harmonization and integration of pharmacogenomics screens.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

452 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Brinton Seashore-LudlowCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Matthew G ReesCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Jaime H CheahCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Murat CokolFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Edmund V PriceCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Matthew E ColettiCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Victor JonesCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Nicole E BodycombeCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Christian K SouleCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Joshua GouldCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Benjamin AlexanderCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ava LiCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Philip MontgomeryCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Mathias J WawerCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Nurdan KuruFaculty of Engineering and Natural Sciences, Sabanci University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Joanne D KotzCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
C Suk-Yee HonCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Benito MunozCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Ted LiefeldCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Vlado DančíkCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Joshua A BittkerCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Michelle PalmerCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
James E BradnerCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts. Cancer Biology and Medical Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Alykhan F ShamjiCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts. pclemons@broadinstitute.org stuart_schreiber@harvard.edu ashamji@broadinstitute.org.
Paul A ClemonsCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts. pclemons@broadinstitute.org stuart_schreiber@harvard.edu ashamji@broadinstitute.org.
Stuart L SchreiberCenter for the Science of Therapeutics, Broad Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Broad Institute · USSabancı Üniversitesi · TR

Funding

Targeting Causal Cancer Genes with Small MoleculesRC2CA148399 · NCI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SCHREIBER, STUART L · 2009 to 2012
$5.2M
Cancer dependencies associated with genomic alterations and targeted by small molU01CA176152 · NCI · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI SCHREIBER, STUART L · 2013 to 2016
$4.4M
Howard Hughes Medical InstituteNCI NIH HHS RC2 CA148399NCI NIH HHS U01 CA176152NCI NIH HHS U01CA176152
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledIdentifying genetic alterations that prime a cancer cell to respond to a particular therapeutic agent can facilitate the development of precision cancer medicines. Cancer cell-line (CCL) profiling of small-molecule sensitivity has emerged as an unbiased method to assess the relationships between genetic or cellular features of CCLs and small-molecule response. Here, we developed annotated cluster multidimensional enrichment analysis to explore the associations between groups of small molecules and groups of CCLs in a new, quantitative sensitivity dataset. This analysis reveals insights into small-molecule mechanisms of action, and genomic features that associate with CCL response to small-molecule treatment. We are able to recapitulate known relationships between FDA-approved therapies and cancer dependencies and to uncover new relationships, including for KRAS-mutant cancers and neuroblastoma. To enable the cancer community to explore these data, and to generate novel hypotheses, we created an updated version of the Cancer Therapeutic Response Portal (CTRP v2). SIGNIFICANCE: We present the largest CCL sensitivity dataset yet available, and an analysis method integrating information from multiple CCLs and multiple small molecules to identify CCL response predictors robustly. We updated the CTRP to enable the cancer research community to leverage these data and analyses.

Indexed as

Drug Screening Assays, AntitumorSmall Molecule LibrariesAntineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCell SurvivalCluster AnalysisComputational BiologyDatasets as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Resistance, NeoplasmDrug SynergismGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMutationNeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsProtein Kinase InhibitorsSmall Molecule Libraries

Identifiers

PMID26482930
PMCPMC4631646
OpenAlexW2175970000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.