Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26482786›Full record

Trial reportTobacco control2016

Testing antismoking messages for Air Force trainees.

Lucy Popova, Brittany D Linde, Zoran Bursac, G Wayne Talcott, Mary V Modayil, Melissa A Little, Pamela M Ling, Stanton A Glantz, Robert C Klesges

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Tobacco control, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review.American journal of preventive medicine · 2017
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Evaluating the Effects of a Brief Tobacco Intervention in the US Air Force.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2020
    Trial
  4. Feeling Hopeful Motivates Change: Emotional Responses to Messages Communicating Comparative Risk of Electronic Cigarettes and Combusted Cigarettes.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2019
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "Nobody Views It As a Negative Thing to Smoke": A Qualitative Study of the Relationship Between United States Air Force Culture and Tobacco Use.Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Article
  8. Use of electronic cigarettes in the United States service member and Veteran populations: A narrative review (2019).Military psychology : the official journal of the Division of Military Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. E-Cigarette Marketing and Communication: How E-Cigarette Companies Market E-Cigarettes and the Public Engages with E-cigarette Information.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Do Emotions Spark Interest in Alternative Tobacco Products?Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lucy PopovaCenter for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Brittany D LindeDepartment of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.
Zoran BursacDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Preventive Medicine, Center for Population Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
G Wayne TalcottDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Center for Population Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Mary V ModayilInstitute for Population Health Improvement, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California, USA.
Melissa A LittleDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Center for Population Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Pamela M LingDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Stanton A GlantzDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.
Robert C KlesgesDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Center for Population Sciences, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
University of Tennessee Health Science Center · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USUniversity of California Davis Medical Center · US

Funding

TOBACCO ADVOCACY AT THE STATE LEVELR01CA061021 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GLANTZ, STANTON ARNOLD · 1994 to 2015
$7.4M
Understanding Smokeless Tobacco MarketingR01CA141661 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LING, PAMELA MAY · 2009 to 2019
$5.4M
Preventing Relapse Following Involuntary Smoking AbstinenceR01HL095785 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI KLESGES, ROBERT C · 2010 to 2015
$3.7M
Communicating harm of new tobacco productsK99CA187460 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI POPOVA, LYUDMILA · 2014 to 2015
$214k
NCI NIH HHS K99 CA187460NCI NIH HHS R01 CA061021NCI NIH HHS R01 CA141661NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL095785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionYoung adults in the military are aggressively targeted by tobacco companies and are at high risk of tobacco use. Existing antismoking advertisements developed for the general population might be effective in educating young adults in the military. This study evaluated the effects of different themes of existing antismoking advertisements on perceived harm and intentions to use cigarettes and other tobacco products among Air Force trainees.

methodsIn a pretest-post-test experiment, 782 Airmen were randomised to view antismoking advertisements in 1 of 6 conditions: anti-industry, health effects+anti-industry, sexual health, secondhand smoke, environment+anti-industry or control. We assessed the effect of different conditions on changes in perceived harm and intentions to use cigarettes, electronic cigarettes, smokeless tobacco, hookah and cigarillos from pretest to post-test with multivariable linear regression models (perceived harm) and zero-inflated Poisson regression model (intentions).

resultsAntismoking advertisements increased perceived harm of various tobacco products and reduced intentions to use. Advertisements featuring negative effects of tobacco on health and sexual performance coupled with revealing tobacco industry manipulations had the most consistent pattern of effects on perceived harm and intentions.

conclusionsAntismoking advertisements produced for the general public might also be effective with a young adult military population and could have spillover effects on perceptions of harm and intentions to use other tobacco products besides cigarettes. Existing antismoking advertising may be a cost-effective tool to educate young adults in the military.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAdvertisingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsFemaleHealth EducationHumansLinear ModelsMaleMilitary PersonnelSmokingSmoking CessationSmoking PreventionTobacco ProductsTobacco, SmokelessYoung AdultAdvertising and PromotionMediaNon-cigarette tobacco productsPriority/special populations

Identifiers

PMID26482786
PMCPMC4837096
OpenAlexW2265394103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.