Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26482733›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomechanics2015

Fusion of clinical and stochastic finite element data for hip fracture risk prediction.

Peng Jiang, Samy Missoum, Zhao Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Numerical Modeling of Shockwave Treatment of Knee Joint.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  4. Risk Assessment of Hip Fracture Based on Machine Learning.Applied bionics and biomechanics · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Peng JiangAerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Samy MissoumAerospace and Mechanical Engineering Department, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA. Electronic address: smissoum@email.arizona.edu.
Zhao ChenMel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
University of Arizona · US

Funding

A New Hip Fracture Risk Prediction Tool Based on Common Predictors and Hip GeomerR21AR060811 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI CHEN, ZHAO, MISSOUM, SAMY · 2011 to 2012
$358k
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100046CNIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR060811NIA NIH HHS HHSN271201100004CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100001CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100003CWHI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hip fracture affects more than 250,000 people in the US and 1.6 million worldwide per year. With an aging population, the development of reliable fracture risk models is therefore of prime importance. Due to the complexity of the hip fracture phenomenon, the use of clinical data only, as it is done traditionally, might not be sufficient to ensure an accurate and robust hip fracture prediction model. In order to increase the predictive ability of the risk model, the authors propose to supplement the clinical data with computational data from finite element models. The fusion of the two types of data is performed using deterministic and stochastic computational data. In the latter case, uncertainties in loading and material properties of the femur are accounted for and propagated through the finite element model. The predictive capability of a support vector machine (SVM) risk model constructed by combining clinical and finite element data was assessed using a Women׳s Health Initiative (WHI) dataset. The dataset includes common factors such as age and BMD as well as geometric factors obtained from DXA imaging. The fusion of computational and clinical data systematically leads to an increase in predictive ability of the SVM risk model as measured by the AUC metric. It is concluded that the largest gains in AUC are obtained by the stochastic approach. This gain decreases as the dimensionality of the problem increases: a 5.3% AUC improvement was achieved for a 9 dimensional problem involving geometric factors and weight while a 1.3% increase was obtained for a 20 dimensional case including geometric and conventional factors.

Indexed as

AgedAgingBiomechanical PhenomenaComputer SimulationFemaleFemurFinite Element AnalysisHip FracturesHumansMiddle AgedModels, StatisticalRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC CurveStochastic ProcessesSupport Vector MachineData fusionFinite element modelingHip fracture predictionSupport vector machines

Identifiers

PMID26482733
PMCPMC4737502
OpenAlexW2178531585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.