Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26482271›Full record

SynthesisBMC health services research2015

A systematic review comparing the costs of chiropractic care to other interventions for spine pain in the United States.

Simon Dagenais, O'Dane Brady, Scott Haldeman, Pran Manga

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudySystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. When there is little or no research evidence: a clinical decision tool.The Journal of the Canadian Chiropractic Association · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. 'Next steps' for researching orthopedic manual therapy.The Journal of manual & manipulative therapy · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Spinal manipulative therapy for low back pain-time for an update.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Simon DagenaisSpine Research LLC, 540 Main Street #7, Winchester, MA, 01890, USA. simon@spine-research.com.
O'Dane BradyWorld Spine Care, Santa Ana, CA, USA. odanebrady@gmail.com.
Scott HaldemanWorld Spine Care, Santa Ana, CA, USA. haldemanmd@aol.com.
Pran MangaTelfer School of Management, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. pranlalmanga@yahoo.ca.
Care International · CHPrecision Spine (United States) · USUniversity of California, Irvine · USUniversity of Ottawa · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlthough chiropractors in the United States (US) have long suggested that their approach to managing spine pain is less costly than other health care providers (HCPs), it is unclear if available evidence supports this premise.

methodsA systematic review was conducted using a comprehensive search strategy to uncover studies that compared health care costs for patients with any type of spine pain who received chiropractic care or care from other HCPs. Only studies conducted in the US and published in English between 1993 and 2015 were included. Health care costs were summarized for studies examining: 1. private health plans, 2. workers' compensation (WC) plans, and 3. clinical outcomes. The quality of studies in the latter group was evaluated using a Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) list.

resultsThe search uncovered 1276 citations and 25 eligible studies, including 12 from private health plans, 6 from WC plans, and 7 that examined clinical outcomes. Chiropractic care was most commonly compared to care from a medical physician, with few details about the care received. Heterogeneity was noted among studies in patient selection, definition of spine pain, scope of costs compared, study duration, and methods to estimate costs. Overall, cost comparison studies from private health plans and WC plans reported that health care costs were lower with chiropractic care. In studies that also examined clinical outcomes, there were few differences in efficacy between groups, and health care costs were higher for those receiving chiropractic care. The effects of adjusting for differences in sociodemographic, clinical, or other factors between study groups were unclear.

conclusionsAlthough cost comparison studies suggest that health care costs were generally lower among patients whose spine pain was managed with chiropractic care, the studies reviewed had many methodological limitations. Better research is needed to determine if these differences in health care costs were attributable to the type of HCP managing their care.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAdultBack PainChiropracticCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SelectionUnited StatesWorkers' Compensation

Identifiers

PMID26482271
PMCPMC4615617
OpenAlexW2108331384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.