Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26482176›Full record

ArticleTranslational stroke research2015

Translating G-CSF as an Adjunct Therapy to Stem Cell Transplantation for Stroke.

Ike dela Peña, Cesar V Borlongan

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational stroke research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Genetic Aspects of Inflammation and Immune Response in Stroke.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Rehabilitation and the Neural Network After Stroke.Translational stroke research · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Vascular precursor cells in tissue injury repair.Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine · 2017
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ike dela Peña
Cesar V Borlongan
Loma Linda University · USUniversity of South Florida · US

Funding

Blood-Brain Barrier Repair in Cell Therapy for StrokeR01NS071956 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI BORLONGAN, CESARIO V, GARBUZOVA-DAVIS, SVITLANA NICOLAI · 2011 to 2015
$2.1M
Vascular repair extends therapeutic window for ischemic strokeR21NS089851 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI BORLONGAN, CESARIO V · 2014 to 2015
$411k
NINDS NIH HHS 1R01NS071956-01A1NINDS NIH HHS 1R21NS089851-0NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS071956NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS089851
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among recently investigated stroke therapies, stem cell treatment holds great promise by virtue of their putative ability to replace lost cells, promote endogenous neurogenesis,and produce behavioral and functional improvement through their "bystander effects." Translating stem cell in the clinic, however, presents a number of technical difficulties. A strategy suggested to enhance therapeutic utility of stem cells is combination therapy, i.e., co-transplantation of stem cells or adjunct treatment with pharmacological agents and substrates,which is assumed to produce more profound therapeutic benefits by circumventing limitations of individual treatments and facilitating complementary brain repair processes. We previously demonstrated enhanced functional effects of cotreatment with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF)and human umbilical cord blood cell (hUCB) transplantation in animal models of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Here,we suggest that the aforementioned combination therapy may also produce synergistic effects in stroke. Accordingly, G-CSF treatment may reduce expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and enhance neurogenesis rendering a receptive microenvironment for hUCB engraftment. Adjunct treatment of GCSF with hUCB may facilitate stemness maintenance and guide neural lineage commitment of hUCB cells. Moreover, regenerative mechanisms afforded by G-CSF-mobilized endogenous stem cells, secretion of growth factors by hUCB grafts and G-CSF-recruited endothelial progenitor cells(EPCs), as well as the potential graft–host integration that may promote synaptic circuitry re-establishment could altogether produce more pronounced functional improvement in stroked rats subjected to a combination G-CSF treatment and hUCB transplantation. Nevertheless, differences in pathology and repair processes underlying TBI and stroke deserve consideration when testing the effects of combinatorial G-CSF and hUCB cell transplantation for stroke treatment. Further studies are also required to determine the safety and efficacy of this intervention in both preclinical and clinical stroke studies.

Indexed as

Cord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsBrainBrain InjuriesCombined Modality TherapyDisease Models, AnimalGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating FactorHumansNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisRatsStrokeTranslational Research, BiomedicalTreatment OutcomeGranulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor

Identifiers

PMID26482176
PMCPMC4733422
OpenAlexW2096881080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.