Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26482090›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2015

Evaluation of a brief intervention to reduce the negative consequences of drug misuse among adult emergency department patients.

Wentao Guan, Tao Liu, Janette R Baird, Roland C Merchant

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Motivational interviewing for substance use reduction.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wentao GuanDepartment of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Tao LiuDepartment of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Janette R BairdDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Roland C MerchantDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: rmerchant@lifespan.org.
Brown University · US

Funding

Translational ScienceP30AI042853 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI CURT G BECKWITH · 1998 to 2026
$51.7M
Brief Intervention for Drug Misuse for the Emergency Department (BIDMED)R01DA026066 · NIDA · RHODE ISLAND HOSPITAL · PI MERCHANT, ROLAND C, NIRENBERG, TED D · 2009 to 2013
$3.3M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI042853NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA026066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesDetermine if a brief intervention (BI) reduces the negative consequences of drug use/misuse among adult emergency department (ED) patients, and identify patients more likely to benefit from the BI.

methodsThis randomized, controlled trial enrolled 1026 18-64 year-old ED patients whose drug misuse indicated a needed for a BI. Differences in total Inventory of Drug Use Consequences (InDUC) scores between the treatment (BI) and control arms (no BI) were assessed every 90 days over a one-year period. Regression models were constructed to identify demographic and clinical factors associated with greater reductions in total InDUC scores.

resultsAlthough total InDUC scores decreased for both the treatment and control arms, there were no differences in scores between the treatment and the control arms at baseline at each follow-up. In the regression analyses, participants who were not using drugs or received drug treatment in the past 90 days generally had lower InDUC scores at each follow-up.

conclusionsAlthough negative consequences decreased in both study arms over time, receiving a BI did not lead to a greater reduction in the negative consequences of drug misuse than not receiving a BI. Of importance in the design of future ED drug misuse interventions, participants who were successful in stopping their drug misuse or receiving drug treatment did show fewer negative consequences of drug use/misuse.

Indexed as

Drug UsersEmergency Service, HospitalAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSubstance-Related DisordersTime FactorsYoung AdultAdultEmergency medical services/methodsEmergency serviceMotivational interviewingSubstance-related disorders/therapyTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID26482090
PMCPMC4663151
OpenAlexW1829337592

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.