Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26482078›Full record

ReviewDer Internist2015

[Antibiotic stewardship: Measures for optimization of antibacterial therapy].

K de With

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Internist, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Requirements for the rational use of antibiotics based on antibiotic stewardship].Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

K de With

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Because the development of resistance is steadily increasing, especially among Gram-negative pathogens and new developments in antibiotics are lacking, a rational antibiotic therapy is necessary now more than ever. A continuing uncritical and non-guideline-conform use of antibiotics leads to selection of multidrug-resistant pathogens, which can colonize patients and as instigators of infections make treatment more difficult. A prerequisite for targeted antibiotic therapy is a critical testing of the suspected infection diagnosis based on a guideline-conform microbiological preanalytical procedure. To promote a guideline-conform antibiotic therapy in hospitals with respect to choice of substance, dosage and duration, in December 2013 so-called antibiotic stewardship (ABS) measures were summarized in a so-called S3-guideline from the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) under the auspices of the German Society for Infectious Diseases (DGI). With a strategy of targeted antibiotic therapy and infection prevention it is possible to achieve optimum treatment results and to minimize the development of resistance.

Indexed as

Drug Administration SchedulePractice Guidelines as TopicAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial InfectionsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Resistance, BacterialEvidence-Based MedicineGermanyHumansInfectious Disease MedicineAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.