Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26482031›Full record

Trial reportTrials2015

Postoperative negative-pressure incision therapy following open colorectal surgery (Poniy): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

André L Mihaljevic, Rebekka Schirren, Tara C Müller, Victoria Kehl, Helmut Friess, Jörg Kleeff

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. [Prevention of postoperative infections : Evidence-based principles].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

André L MihaljevicDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München and CHIR-Net Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. andre.mihaljevic@tum.de.
Rebekka SchirrenDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München and CHIR-Net Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. rebekka.schirren@tum.de.
Tara C MüllerDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München and CHIR-Net Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. tara.mueller@tum.de.
Victoria KehlInstitute for Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universtität München, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. victoria.kehl@tum.de.
Helmut FriessDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München and CHIR-Net Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. helmut.friess@tum.de.
Jörg KleeffDepartment of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München and CHIR-Net Munich, Ismaningerstrasse 22, 81675, Munich, Germany. kleeff@tum.de.
Klinikum rechts der Isar · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPostoperative surgical site infections cause substantial morbidity, prolonged hospitalization, costs and even mortality, and remain one of the most frequent surgical complications. In prospective trials with adequate follow-up, more than 20 % of patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery are affected and methods to reduce surgical site infections are urgently needed. Negative-pressure incision therapy is a novel intervention that holds promise to reduce postoperative wound infection rates, but has not yet been rigorously tested in a randomized controlled trial. METHODS/

designThe aim is to investigate whether the postoperative application of a negative-pressure incision therapy device for 5-7 days reduces the rate of surgical site infections following open elective colorectal surgery by 50 %. This is a randomized, controlled, observer-blinded multicentre clinical trial with two parallel study groups. The primary outcome measure will be the rate of surgical site infections within 30 days postoperatively. Surgical site infections are defined according to criteria of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Statistical analysis of the primary endpoint measure will be based on the intention-to-treat population. The global level of significance is set at 5 % (two-sided) and the sample size (n = 170 per group) is determined to assure a power of 80 %. DISCUSSION: The Poniy trial will explore whether the rate of surgical site infections can be reduced by the application of a negative-pressure incision therapy device in patients undergoing open elective colorectal surgery. Its pragmatic design guarantees high external validity and clinical relevance.

trial registrationDeutsches Register Klinischer Studien DRKS00006199 .

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsColonDigestive System Surgical ProceduresElective Surgical ProceduresGermanyHumansIntention to Treat AnalysisNegative-Pressure Wound TherapyRectumResearch DesignRisk FactorsSurgical Wound InfectionTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID26482031
PMCPMC4617637
OpenAlexW2108811677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.