SynthesisChinese medical journal2015
Distribution of Major Pathogens from Sputum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid in Patients with Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in Chinese medical journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The bacteriology of bronchiectasis patients and relation to disease severity.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- How bronchoscopy can impact bronchiectasis management: a prospective, observational study.ERJ open research · 2026Article
- Bacterial Isolates from Bronchoalveolar Lavage in Pediatric Patients with Protracted Bacterial Bronchitis or Bronchiectasis: A Retrospective Comparative Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Potential Microorganisms from Bronchial Lavage Fluid in Bronchiectasis Patients: Bacteria, Nontuberculous Mycobacteria, and Fungi.The open respiratory medicine journal · 2025Article
- Characteristics of different pathogenic bacterial infections and their effects on prognosis in adult patients with bronchiectasis.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2024Article
- Review
- Microbiology sampling in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis cases from northern Alberta.PloS one · 2023Article
- Value of sputum Gram stain, sputum culture, and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid Gram stain in predicting single bacterial pathogen among children with community-acquired pneumonia.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2022Article
- Antimicrobial Resistance in Common Respiratory Pathogens of Chronic Bronchiectasis Patients: A Literature Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Exposure ofThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2019Article
- Bronchiectasis Management in China, What We Can Learn from European Respiratory Society Guidelines.Chinese medical journal · 2018Article
- Understanding the Role of Staphylococcus aureus in Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis: Where Are We Now?Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2018Article
- The Prevalence and Significance of Staphylococcus aureus in Patients with Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.Annals of the American Thoracic Society · 2018Article
- Diagnostic Value of Nasopharyngeal Aspirates in Children with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections.Chinese medical journal · 2017Article
- Interactions between Neutrophils and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in Cystic Fibrosis.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017Review
- Swimming Motility Mediates the Formation of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Induced by Flagellated Pseudomonas aeruginosa.PLoS pathogens · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveNoncystic fibrosis (non-CF) bronchiectasis remains as a common health problem in Asia. Pathogens' distribution in airways of patients with non-CF bronchiectasis is important for doctors to make right decision. DATA SOURCES: We performed this systematic review on the English language literatures from 1966 to July 2014, using various search terms included "pathogens" or "bacteria" or "microbiology" and "bronchiectasis" or "non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis" or "non-CF bronchiectasis" or "NCFB." STUDY SELECTION: We included studies of patients with the confirmed non-CF bronchiectasis for which culture methods were required to sputum or bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). Weighted mean isolation rates for Haemophilus influenzae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Stapylococcus aureus, Moxarella catarrhails were compared according to different methodology.
resultsThe total mean bacterial culture positive rates were 63%. For studies using sputum samples, the mean positive culture rates were 74%. For studies using BALF alone or BALF and sputum, it was 48%. The distributions of main bacterial strains were 29% for H. influenzae, 28% for P. aeruginosa, 11% for S. pneumoniae, 12% for S. aureus, and 8% for M. catarrhails with methodology of sputum. Meanwhile, the bacterial distributions were 37% for H. influenzae, 8% for P. aeruginosa, 14% for S. pneumoniae, 5% for S. aureus, and 10% for M. catarrhails with methodology of BALF alone or BALF and sputum. Analysis of the effect of different methodology on the isolation rates revealed some statistically significant differences.
conclusionsH. influenzae accounted for the highest percentage in different methodology. Our results suggested that the total positive culture rates and the proportion of P. aeruginosa from sputum and BALF specimens had significant differences, which can be used in further appropriate recommendations for the treatment of non-CF bronchiectasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.