Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26481656›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery2016

Carotid Anatomy Does Not Predict the Risk of New Ischaemic Brain Lesions on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging after Carotid Artery Stenting in the ICSS-MRI Substudy.

D Doig, B M Hobson, M Müller, H R Jäger, R L Featherstone, M M Brown, L H Bonati, T Richards, ICSS-MRI Study Investigators

Abstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

D DoigInstitute of Neurology, University College London, UK.
B M HobsonUniversity College London Medical School, UK.
M MüllerUniversity of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
H R JägerInstitute of Neurology, University College London, UK.
R L FeatherstoneInstitute of Neurology, University College London, UK.
M M BrownInstitute of Neurology, University College London, UK. Electronic address: martin.brown@ucl.ac.uk.
L H BonatiInstitute of Neurology, University College London, UK; Department of Neurology and Stroke Unit, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
T RichardsDivision of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, UK.
ICSS-MRI Study Investigators

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council G0300411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS, ISRCTN25337470) randomized patients with recently symptomatic carotid artery stenosis > 50% to carotid artery stenting (CAS) or endarterectomy. CAS increased the risk of new brain lesions visible on diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI-MRI) more than endarterectomy in the ICSS-MRI Substudy. The predictors of new post-stenting DWI lesions were assessed in these patients.

methodsICSS-MRI Substudy patients allocated to CAS were studied. Baseline or pre-stenting catheter angiograms were rated to determine carotid anatomy. Baseline patient demographics and the influence of plaque length, plaque morphology, internal carotid angulation, and external or common carotid atheroma were examined in negative binomial regression models.

resultsA total of 115 patients (70% male, average age 70.4) were included; 50.4% had at least one new DWI-MRI-positive lesion following CAS. Independent risk factors increasing the number of new lesions were a left-sided stenosis (incidence risk ratio [IRR] 1.59, 95% CI 1.04-2.44, p = .03), age (IRR 2.10 per 10-year increase in age, 95% CI 1.61-2.74, p < .01), male sex (IRR 2.83, 95% CI 1.72-4.67, p < .01), hypertension (IRR 2.04, 95% CI 1.25-3.33, p < .01) and absence of cardiac failure (IRR 6.58, 95% CI 1.23-35.07, p = .03). None of the carotid anatomical features significantly influenced the number of post-procedure lesions.

conclusionCarotid anatomy seen on pre-stenting catheter angiography did not predict of the number of ischaemic brain lesions following CAS.

Indexed as

Carotid Artery, CommonDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingStentsAgedAge FactorsAngioplastyBrain IschemiaCarotid StenosisComorbidityFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisOdds RatioPredictive Value of TestsBrain ischaemiaCarotid artery stenosisCarotid artery ulcerating plaqueCarotid atherosclerosisStents

Identifiers

PMID26481656
PMCPMC4711310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.