Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26481615›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia research2015

Pursuit eye movements as an intermediate phenotype across psychotic disorders: Evidence from the B-SNIP study.

Rebekka Lencer, Andreas Sprenger, James L Reilly, Jennifer E McDowell, Leah H Rubin, Judith A Badner, Matcheri S Keshavan, Godfrey D Pearlson, Carol A Tamminga, Elliot S Gershon and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Rebekka LencerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Otto Creutzfeld Center, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Andreas SprengerDepartment of Neurology, University of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany.
James L ReillyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, USA.
Jennifer E McDowellDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, USA.
Leah H RubinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Judith A BadnerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Matcheri S KeshavanDepartment of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Beth Israel Deacones Medical Center, Boston, USA.
Godfrey D PearlsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, Olin Research Center, Institute of Living/Hartford Hospital, Hartford, USA; Department of Neurobiology, Yale School of Medicine, Olin Research Center, Institute of Living/Hartford Hospital, Hartford, USA.
Carol A TammingaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
Elliot S GershonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, USA.
Brett A ClementzDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, USA.
John A SweeneyDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA. Electronic address: John.Sweeney@UTSouthwestern.edu.

Funding

UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL1/KL2/TL1)UL1TR001105 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$24.5M
Bipolar & Schizophrenia Consortium for Parsing Intermediate PhenotypesR01MH077851 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TAMMINGA, CAROL A · 2007 to 2019
$7.8M
Bipolar & Schizophrenia Consortium for Parsing Intermediate PhenotypesR01MH077945 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI PEARLSON, GODFREY D · 2007 to 2019
$7.6M
Stability of Biotypes: a Longitudinal EvaluationR01MH078113 · NIMH · WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KESHAVAN, MATCHERI S. · 2007 to 2019
$6.2M
Bipolar & Schizophrenia Consortium for Parsing Intermediate PhenotypesR01MH077852 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI THAKER, GUNVANT K · 2007 to 2010
$3.5M
Bipolar & Schizophrenia Consortium for Parsing Intermediate PhenotypesR01MH077862 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI SWEENEY, JOHN A · 2007 to 2010
$3.1M
Psychosis and Affective Research Domains and Intermediate Phenotypes (PARDIP)R01MH096913 · NIMH · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TAMMINGA, CAROL A · 2013 to 2015
$950k
UT Southwestern Center for Translational Medicine (UL18Kl2/TL1)TL1TR001104 · NCATS · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI TOTO, ROBERT DANIEL · 2013 to 2017
$418k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR001104NCATS NIH HHS TL1TR001104NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001105NIMH NIH HHS MH077851NIMH NIH HHS MH077852NIMH NIH HHS MH077862NIMH NIH HHS MH077945NIMH NIH HHS MH078113NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077851NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077852NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077862NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH077945NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH078113NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH096913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smooth pursuit eye tracking deficits are a promising intermediate phenotype for schizophrenia and possibly for psychotic disorders more broadly. The Bipolar-Schizophrenia Network on Intermediate Phenotypes (B-SNIP) consortium investigated the severity and familiality of different pursuit parameters across psychotic disorders. Probands with schizophrenia (N=265), schizoaffective disorder (N=178), psychotic bipolar disorder (N=231), their first-degree relatives (N=306, N=217, N=273, respectively) and healthy controls (N=305) performed pursuit tracking tasks designed to evaluate sensorimotor and cognitive/predictive aspects of pursuit. Probands from all diagnostic groups were impaired on all pursuit measures of interest compared to controls (p<0.001). Schizophrenia probands were more impaired than other proband groups on both early pursuit gain and predictive gain. Relatives with and without enhanced psychosis spectrum personality traits were impaired on initial eye acceleration, the most direct sensorimotor pursuit measure, but not on pursuit gain measures. This suggests that alterations in early sensorimotor function may track susceptibility to psychosis even in the absence of psychosis related personality traits. There were no differences in pursuit measures between relatives of the three proband groups. Familiality estimates of pursuit deficits indicate that early pursuit gain was more familial than predictive gain, which has been the most widely used measure in previous family studies of psychotic disorders. Thus, while disease-related factors may induce significant impairments of pursuit gain, especially in schizophrenia, the pattern of deficits in relatives and their familiality estimates suggest that alterations in sensorimotor function at pursuit onset may indicate increased susceptibility across psychotic disorders.

Indexed as

AdultAnalysis of VarianceBipolar DisorderElectronic Data ProcessingFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPhenotypePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychotic DisordersPursuit, SmoothSchizophreniaYoung AdultBipolar disorderFamilialityPredictive pursuit eye movementsSchizoaffective disorderSchizophreniaSensorimotor processing

Identifiers

PMID26481615
PMCPMC4681655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.