Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26481502›Full record

SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2015

Effect of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor Asn680Ser polymorphism on the outcomes of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: an updated meta-analysis of 16 cohort studies.

Huilin Tang, Yingying Yan, Tiansheng Wang, Ting Zhang, Weilong Shi, Rong Fan, Yao Yao, Suodi Zhai

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Significance ofInternational journal of reproductive biomedicine · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Effects ofFrontiers in endocrinology · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Huilin TangDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yingying YanDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Tiansheng WangDepartment of Pharmacy Administration and Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ting ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Weilong ShiDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Rong FanDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China.
Yao YaoPharmacy department of Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, 400037, China.
Suodi ZhaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, 100191, China. zhaisuodi@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) Asn680Ser polymorphism on the ovarian response to exogenous follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and clinical outcomes in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH).

methodsA database search was conducted to identify the eligible studies that investigated the effect of FSHR Asn680Ser polymorphism on ovarian response and clinical outcomes. A pooled analysis was performed with the odds ratio (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) and their respective 95 % confidence interval (CI) by the STATA software with random effects model.

resultsSixteen cohort studies comprising a total of 4287 subjects were included. The number of retrieved oocytes was significantly fewer in subjects with the SS genotype at position 680, compared to subjects with the NN or NS genotype (WMD = -1.36, 95 % CI = -1.85 to -0.87). Lack of association was detected between the genotypes (SS genotype vs. NN or NS genotype) and clinical outcomes such as exogenous FSH dose (WMD = 98.96 IU, 95 % CI = -22.33 to 220.24), poor response (OR = 1.08, 95 % CI = 0.71-1.64), ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) (OR = 1.58, 95 % CI = 0.41-6.07), and clinical pregnancy rate (OR = 1.10, 95 % CI = 0.86-1.40). However, poor ovarian response and number of retrieved oocytes were significantly influenced by the Asn680Ser polymorphism in the Asian subjects. In addition, no publication bias was detected.

conclusionFSHR Asn680Ser polymorphism might be a significant biomarker for predicting the number of retrieved oocytes and poor response, especially in Asian subjects. Other outcomes such as exogenous FSH dose, OHSS, and pregnancy rate were not influenced by FSHR Asn680Ser polymorphism.

Indexed as

Ovulation InductionPolymorphism, GeneticCohort StudiesFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenetic MarkersGenotypeHumansOvaryPregnancyPregnancy RateReceptors, FSHRegression AnalysisGenetic MarkersReceptors, FSHFSHRGenetic polymorphismMeta-analysisOvarian response

Identifiers

PMID26481502
PMCPMC4681732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.