ArticleDer Anaesthesist2016
[Telephone enquiries on the topic of malignant hyperthermia: Evaluation of the content and subsequent diagnostic results at the MH Center Leipzig].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMalignant hyperthermia (MH) is an autosomal dominant metabolic myopathy. The in vitro contracture test (IVCT) is still considered to be the gold standard for diagnosing a disposition for MH. However, advances in genetic testing for MH disposition have supplemented or even replaced the invasive procedure of the IVCT. Information about MH can be obtained by either contacting the hotline for MH as a nationwide 24 h/7 days a week service or one of the regional MH centers.
methodsThe protocols of telephone conversations concerning MH at the MH Center University Leipzig were retrospectively analyzed. Data were collected from January 2011 to March 2015. Additionally, the results of the IVCT and genetic testing evolving from the counseling interviews were examined.
resultsA total of 205 telephone calls were documented during the period in question and an IVCT was performed as a consequence of 112 of the telephone calls. The IVCT resulted in 27 individuals being identified as MH susceptible which was subsequently diagnosed in 15 individuals with known familial MH disposition and 12 individuals were identified as new index patients. In 24 individuals a total of 13 different mutations were detected and of these 4 mutations were causative concerning MH. Of the 205 telephone calls 131 were private and 74 of medical professional origin. Among the private enquiries MH disposition within the family was a frequent reason for contacting the MH Center (61.8%). Conversations relating to MH-like symptoms during general anesthesia were carried out with 35.1% of medical doctors and with 22.9% of private callers. Advice about neuromuscular symptoms of unknown genesis was given to 15.3% of private individuals and to 24.3% of medical doctors. Overall MH topics were discussed with 23% (N = 17) of the medical profession and approximately half of these were anesthesiologists (N = 8). Not a single call was documented for the treatment of a suspected MH crisis.
conclusionPrivate individuals and families affected by a MH disposition often showed good compliance with respect to counseling and diagnostics for MH and contacted the MH center more often than medical doctors. A more comprehensive cooperation with the medical profession is preferable and necessary to obtain a systematic and broad synopsis of characteristic and uncharacteristic signs and symptoms of MH. The telephone conversations analyzed as well as the diagnostic results (IVCT and genetic testing) underline that MH disposition is still a current and relevant topic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.