ArticleClinical oral investigations2016
Transdentinal cytotoxicity of resin-based luting cements to pulp cells.
Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Luting Agents on the Pulp of Vital Teeth: A Systematic Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Development of resveratrol-loaded hollow mesoporous silica enhances mechanical performance and biocompatibility of dental resin cement.Discover nano · 2026Article
- Review
- Effect of three different root canal sealants on human dental pulp stem cells.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Dental Luting Cements: An Updated Comprehensive Review.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Cytotoxicity of two self-adhesive resin cements and their interference in the phagocytic activity of murine macrophages.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2022Article
- Cytotoxic Evaluation of the New Composite Resin through an Artificial Pulp Chamber.BioMed research international · 2022Article
- Novel Bioactive Adhesive Monomer CMET Promotes Odontogenic Differentiation and Dentin Regeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Effects of AdperMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effects of Composite Resins on Cultured Human Gingival Fibroblasts.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Cytotoxicity and dentin composition alterations promoted by different chemomechanical caries removal agents: A preliminaryJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2021Article
- In vitro cytotoxicity of different dental resin-cements on human cell lines.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2021Article
- Cytotoxic effects of different self-adhesive resin cements: Cell viability and induction of apoptosis.The journal of advanced prosthodontics · 2020Article
- Effect of various polymerization protocols on the cytotoxicity of conventional and self-adhesive resin-based luting cements.Clinical oral investigations · 2020Article
- Cytotoxicity of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements on Human Periodontal Ligament Fibroblasts.BioMed research international · 2018Article
- Decellularized Hydrogels in Bone Tissue Engineering: A Topical Review.International journal of medical sciences · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the transdentinal cytotoxicity of components released from different resin-based luting cements to cultured MDPC-23 odontoblast-like cells and human dental pulp cells (HDPCs). MATERIALS AND
methodsArtificial pulp chamber (APC)/dentin disc sets were distributed into four groups according to the materials tested (n = 10), as follows: G1, control (no treatment); G2, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RelyX Luting 2); G3, self-adhesive resin cement (RelyX U200); and G4, conventional resin cement (RelyX ARC). The materials were applied to the occlusal surfaces (facing up) of the dentin discs adapted to the APCs. The pulpal surfaces of the discs were maintained in contact with culture medium. Then, an aliquot of 400 μL from the extract (culture medium + resin-based components that diffused through dentin) of each luting cement was applied for 24 h to HDPCs or MDPC-23 cells previously seeded in wells of 24-well plates. Cell viability analysis was performed by the MTT assay (1-way ANOVA/Tukey test; α = 5 %).
resultsFor MDPC-23 cells, RelyX ARC (G4) and RelyX Luting 2 (G2) caused greater reduction in cell viability compared with the negative control group (P < 0.05). Only the HDPCs exposed to RelyX ARC (G4) extract showed a tendency toward viability decrease (9.3 %); however, the values were statistically similar to those of the control group (G1) (P > 0.05).
conclusionsIn accordance with the safe limits of ISO 10993-5:1999 (E) recommendations, all resin-based luting cements evaluated in this study can be considered as non-toxic to pulp cells. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Cytotoxicity of resin-based luting cements is material-dependent, and the different protocols for the application of these dental materials to dentin may interfere with their cytotoxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26481234What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.