Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26481214›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2015

High adherence to malaria treatment: promising results of an adherence study in South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo.

Sibylle Gerstl, Alexis Namagana, Liliana Palacios, Franklin Mweshi, Stella Aprile, Angeles Lima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sibylle GerstlMédecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Barcelona, Spain. sgerstl@aol.com.
Alexis NamaganaMSF, Shabunda, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. alexis_namagana@hotmail.fr.
Liliana PalaciosMédecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Barcelona, Spain. Liliana.PALACIOS@barcelona.msf.org.
Franklin MweshiGovernmental Reference Hospital, Shabunda, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. franklinmweshi@gmail.com.
Stella AprileMSF, Bukavu, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo. STEAPLE2@gmail.com.
Angeles LimaMédecins Sans Frontières (MSF), Barcelona, Spain. nines.lima@barcelona.msf.org.
Médecins Sans Frontières · ESKinshasa General Hospital · CD

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn resource-poor settings, treatment adherence is a major determinant of response to anti-malarial drugs as most are taken at home without medical supervision. Evidence on adherence to artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT) is limited. The study aimed to measure adherence and identify reasons for non-adherence to a 3-day, fixed-dose combination (FDC) of artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ), the first-line treatment for uncomplicated malaria in the Médecins Sans Frontières project in the Shabunda Health Zone, South Kivu, Democratic Republic of Congo, a highly malarious and conflict-affected area.

methodsThe study took place in the health centres/outpatient departments of the Shabunda general hospital, the quarter Mbangayo, and participant households. Patients prescribed FDC ASAQ were visited at home on the day after their regimen finished and asked to complete an adherence questionnaire. Patients/caretakers were also interviewed when exiting the outpatient department to understand their attitude towards FDC ASAQ and assess the quality of the prescribing process.

results148 patients/caretakers completed the adherence questionnaire: 11.5 % (17/148, 95 % CI 7-17) had ≥1 tablet left at the time of the home visit and were defined as certainly non-adherent; 13.5 % (20/148, 95 % CI 8-19) were probably non-adherent; thus total non-adherence was 25.0 % (37/148, 95 % CI 18-32). 75 % (111/148, 95 % CI 68-82) were defined as probably adherent. In exit interviews, 87.5 % (105/120) knew they had malaria or could name the correct signs/symptoms. 89 % (107/120) could identify FDC ASAQ as anti-malarials among all tablets given and correctly repeat the intake instructions given at the outpatient department.

conclusionsThis is the first study to assess adherence to an FDC of ACT under real treatment conditions in a context of high instability. High quality prescribing of anti-malarials at health centre level and patient adherence to the correct intake of ACT were possible in this setting. Adherence to treatment regimen requires careful and constant monitoring which might be better guaranteed at health centre rather than community level. It could, nevertheless, be a precondition to the successful introduction of home- or community based management of malaria.

Indexed as

Medication AdherenceAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmodiaquineAnimalsAntimalarialsArtemisininsChildChild, PreschoolDemocratic Republic of the CongoDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansInfantAmodiaquineamodiaquine, artesunate drug combinationAntimalarialsArtemisininsDrug Combinations

Identifiers

PMID26481214
PMCPMC4615331
OpenAlexW2135140437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.