ArticleArtificial intelligence in medicine2016
Information extraction from multi-institutional radiology reports.
Article in Artificial intelligence in medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 79 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
79 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Performance of Natural Language Processing Model in Extracting Information from Free-Text Radiology Reports: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Can antiepileptic efficacy and epilepsy variables be studied from electronic health records? A review of current approaches.Seizure · 2021Pooled it
- Natural language processing systems for capturing and standardizing unstructured clinical information: A systematic review.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2017Pooled it
- Large Language Models for Ankle Fracture Classification and Management Prediction from Routine Clinical Documentation: A Single-Center Exploratory Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- Triage and workflow optimization with artificial intelligence in pediatric imaging.Pediatric radiology · 2026Review
- Leveraging large language models for information extraction from free-text liver MRI reports and assessment of clinical utility: a multicenter study.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Implementing a Resource-Light and Low-Code Large Language Model System for Information Extraction from Mammography Reports: A Pilot Study.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2026Article
- BI-RADS-compliant structured mammography reporting using locally deployed large language models under privacy constraints.European radiology · 2026Article
- Agent-based large language model system for extracting structured data from breast cancer synoptic reports: a dual-validation study.JAMIA open · 2026Article
- Next-Generation Advances in Prostate Cancer Imaging and Artificial Intelligence Applications.Journal of imaging · 2025Review
- Two stage large language model approach enhancing entity classification and relationship mapping in radiology reports.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- RADEX: a rule-based clinical and radiology data extraction tool demonstrated on thyroid ultrasound reports.European radiology · 2025Article
- EchoLLM: extracting echocardiogram entities with light-weight, open-source large language models.JAMIA open · 2025Article
- Fine-tuning of language models for automated structuring of medical exam reports to improve patient screening and analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Data extraction from free-text stroke CT reports using GPT-4o and Llama-3.3-70B: the impact of annotation guidelines.European radiology experimental · 2025Article
- [Transformation of free-text radiology reports into structured data].Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Using Natural Language Processing to Identify Home Health Care Patients at Risk for Diagnosis of Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias.Journal of applied gerontology : the official journal of the Southern Gerontological Society · 2024Article
- Extracting Pulmonary Nodules and Nodule Characteristics from Radiology Reports of Lung Cancer Screening Patients Using Transformer Models.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2024Article
- Turning radiology reports into epidemiological data to track seasonal pulmonary infections and the COVID-19 pandemic.European radiology · 2024Article
- Automatic generation of conclusions from neuroradiology MRI reports through natural language processing.Neuroradiology · 2024Article
19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe radiology report is the most important source of clinical imaging information. It documents critical information about the patient's health and the radiologist's interpretation of medical findings. It also communicates information to the referring physicians and records that information for future clinical and research use. Although efforts to structure some radiology report information through predefined templates are beginning to bear fruit, a large portion of radiology report information is entered in free text. The free text format is a major obstacle for rapid extraction and subsequent use of information by clinicians, researchers, and healthcare information systems. This difficulty is due to the ambiguity and subtlety of natural language, complexity of described images, and variations among different radiologists and healthcare organizations. As a result, radiology reports are used only once by the clinician who ordered the study and rarely are used again for research and data mining. In this work, machine learning techniques and a large multi-institutional radiology report repository are used to extract the semantics of the radiology report and overcome the barriers to the re-use of radiology report information in clinical research and other healthcare applications. MATERIAL AND
methodsWe describe a machine learning system to annotate radiology reports and extract report contents according to an information model. This information model covers the majority of clinically significant contents in radiology reports and is applicable to a wide variety of radiology study types. Our automated approach uses discriminative sequence classifiers for named-entity recognition to extract and organize clinically significant terms and phrases consistent with the information model. We evaluated our information extraction system on 150 radiology reports from three major healthcare organizations and compared its results to a commonly used non-machine learning information extraction method. We also evaluated the generalizability of our approach across different organizations by training and testing our system on data from different organizations.
resultsOur results show the efficacy of our machine learning approach in extracting the information model's elements (10-fold cross-validation average performance: precision: 87%, recall: 84%, F1 score: 85%) and its superiority and generalizability compared to the common non-machine learning approach (p-value<0.05).
conclusionsOur machine learning information extraction approach provides an effective automatic method to annotate and extract clinically significant information from a large collection of free text radiology reports. This information extraction system can help clinicians better understand the radiology reports and prioritize their review process. In addition, the extracted information can be used by researchers to link radiology reports to information from other data sources such as electronic health records and the patient's genome. Extracted information also can facilitate disease surveillance, real-time clinical decision support for the radiologist, and content-based image retrieval.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.