Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26479710›Full record

ArticleeLife2015

Pericytes are progenitors for coronary artery smooth muscle.

Katharina S Volz, Andrew H Jacobs, Heidi I Chen, Aruna Poduri, Andrew S McKay, Daniel P Riordan, Natalie Kofler, Jan Kitajewski, Irving Weissman, Kristy Red-Horse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 141 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
141citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

141 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mechanisms of Pericyte-Mediated Cancer Metastasis.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

81 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Katharina S VolzStem Cell and Regenerative Medicine PhD Program, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, United States.
Andrew H JacobsDepartment of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Heidi I ChenDepartment of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Aruna PoduriDepartment of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Andrew S McKayDepartment of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.
Daniel P RiordanDepartment of Biochemistry, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, United States.
Natalie KoflerColumbia University Medical Center, New York, United States.
Jan KitajewskiColumbia University Medical Center, New York, United States.
Irving WeissmanInstitute for Stem Cell and Regenerative Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Ludwig Center, Stanford, United States.
Kristy Red-HorseDepartment of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, United States.

Funding

GENETICS TRAINING PROGRAM FOR PHD CANDIDATEST32GM007790 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI BRUNET, ANNE, KINGSLEY, DAVID M · 1985 to 2020
$12.8M
Interrogation of individual cells to identify progenitors and their nichesU01HL099999 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WEISSMAN, IRVING L. · 2009 to 2015
$7.8M
Interrogation of individual cells to identify progenitor cells and their nichesU01HL099995 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI KRASNOW, MARK A · 2009 to 2015
$7.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099995NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL099999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epicardial cells on the heart's surface give rise to coronary artery smooth muscle cells (caSMCs) located deep in the myocardium. However, the differentiation steps between epicardial cells and caSMCs are unknown as are the final maturation signals at coronary arteries. Here, we use clonal analysis and lineage tracing to show that caSMCs derive from pericytes, mural cells associated with microvessels, and that these cells are present in adults. During development following the onset of blood flow, pericytes at arterial remodeling sites upregulate Notch3 while endothelial cells express Jagged-1. Deletion of Notch3 disrupts caSMC differentiation. Our data support a model wherein epicardial-derived pericytes populate the entire coronary microvasculature, but differentiate into caSMCs at arterial remodeling zones in response to Notch signaling. Our data are the first demonstration that pericytes are progenitors for smooth muscle, and their presence in adult hearts reveals a new potential cell type for targeting during cardiovascular disease.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAnimalsCoronary VesselsMice, Inbred C57BLMuscle CellsMuscle, SmoothPericytesReceptor, Notch3Receptors, NotchStem CellsUp-RegulationNotch3 protein, mouseReceptor, Notch3Receptors, Notchcardiovascular developmentdevelopmental biologymouseNotch signalingstem cellsvascular smooth muscle

Identifiers

PMID26479710
PMCPMC4728130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.